From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [XEN-4.4] tools/libxc: Fix build of 32bit
 toolstacks on CentOS 5.x following XSA-125
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:26:12 +0100
Message-ID: <55895E74.3080805@citrix.com>
References: <1428940983-8709-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
	<1428941095-8832-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
	<21897.15119.48527.473325@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<21897.23891.977074.980023@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <21897.23891.977074.980023@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 23/06/15 14:21, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [XEN-4.4] tools/libxc: Fix build of 32bit toolstacks on CentOS 5.x following XSA-125"):
>> Andrew Cooper writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] [XEN-4.4] tools/libxc: Fix build of 32bit toolstacks on CentOS 5.x following XSA-125"):
>>> gcc 4.1 of CentOS 5.x era does not like the typecheck in min() between
>>> uint64_t and unsigned long.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>>> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
>>> CC: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
>>> CC: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
>>> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This needs backporting to 4.2
>> This doesn't seem to apply to my staging-4.5.
> Sorry, I meant, to my staging-4.4.

You appear to have committed half of it as staging-4.4~2

~Andrew