From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:25:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <559289.9837.qm@web56104.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <4B9A9FCC.2020002@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0633029058==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B9A9FCC.2020002@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Sheng Yang , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============0633029058== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1504673611-1268429139=:9837" --0-1504673611-1268429139=:9837 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Per yours feed it seems it makes sense try load patched Xen 4-0.rc6 with 2.= 6.32.9 (stable).=A0 It would be a fair . Right ? Boris. --- On Fri, 3/12/10, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen To: "Boris Derzhavets" Cc: "Stefano Stabellini" , "xen-devel@lis= ts.xensource.com" , "Sheng Yang" Date: Friday, March 12, 2010, 3:10 PM On 03/12/2010 07:01 AM, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > I've applied attached patch to the most recent clone of xen-unstable.hg > Checked out branch xen/pvhvm-stefano and built 2.6.31.6 pvops kernel > based on this branch. > Xen Host reboots right away. >=20 Can you tell whether its Xen itself crashing, or if the dom0 kernel is cras= hing? Once Xen is patched, it should be sufficient to run a patched domU hvm kern= el (you don't need to update your dom0 kernel). =A0 =A0 J =0A=0A=0A --0-1504673611-1268429139=:9837 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-1504673611-1268429139=:9837-- --===============0633029058== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel --===============0633029058==--
Per yours feed it seems it makes sense try lo= ad patched Xen 4-0.rc6 with 2.6.32.9 (stable).  It would be a fair . R= ight ?

Boris.

--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Jeremy Fitzhardinge = <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

From= : Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [= PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo= .com>
Cc: "Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com&g= t;, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, = "Sheng Yang" <sheng@linux.intel.com>
Date: Friday, March 12, 2010,= 3:10 PM

On 03/12/2010 07:01 AM, Boris Derz= havets wrote:
> I've applied attached patch to the most recent clone = of xen-unstable.hg
> Checked out branch xen/pvhvm-stefano and built 2.6= .31.6 pvops kernel
> based on this branch.
> Xen Host reboots r= ight away.
>

Can you tell whether its Xen itself crashing, or= if the dom0 kernel is crashing?

Once Xen is patched, it should be s= ufficient to run a patched domU hvm kernel (you don't need to update your d= om0 kernel).

    J