From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chen, Tiejun" Subject: Re: [v4][PATCH 12/19] tools/libxl: passes rdm reservation policy Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:27:20 +0800 Message-ID: <559503F8.1080002@intel.com> References: <1435053450-25131-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <1435053450-25131-13-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <55934298.7000605@intel.com> <5593C171.40809@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5593C171.40809@eu.citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: George Dunlap Cc: Ian Jackson , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > I'm not only suggesting changing the layout of the patches; I'm Sorry for this misunderstanding. > suggesting modifying the functionality. > > In patch 12 you add a new command-line parameter to xl; so that you have > to type something like this: > > # xl pci-attach ubuntu01 01:00.1,msitranslate=1 relaxed > > What I'm saying is that you can drop the xl part of that patch entirely, > because once you have the xlu code in, you can just do this: > > # xl pci-attach ubuntu01 01:00.1,msitranslate=1,rdm_reserve=relaxed > > This has the positive advantage that you can copy and paste the same > string into both the xl command and the xl config file. > I think you're right, pciattach() | + xlu_pci_parse_bdf() So I really should drop this patch as you said. Thanks Tiejun