From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932087AbbGGLZm (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2015 07:25:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:35005 "EHLO mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757044AbbGGLZe (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2015 07:25:34 -0400 Message-ID: <559BB727.2070106@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 16:55:27 +0530 From: Vaibhav Hiremath User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yizhang@marvell.com, Zhao Ye Subject: Re: [PATCH-V5 3/4] mfd: 88pm800: Set default interrupt clear method References: <1435591877-18214-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <1435591877-18214-4-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <20150707072958.GN3182@x1> <559BA1AE.9050006@linaro.org> <20150707104028.GR3182@x1> <559BAF23.90002@linaro.org> <20150707111248.GU3182@x1> <559BB58E.9010406@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <559BB58E.9010406@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 07 July 2015 04:48 PM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > > > On Tuesday 07 July 2015 04:42 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>> On Tuesday 07 July 2015 04:10 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>>> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday 07 July 2015 12:59 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> As per the spec, bit 1 (INT_CLEAR_MODE) of reg addr 0xe >>>>>>> (page 0) controls the method of clearing interrupt >>>>>>> status of 88pm800 family of devices; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 0: clear on read >>>>>>> 1: clear on write >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If pdata is not coming from board file, then set the >>>>>>> default irq clear method to "irq clear on write" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, as suggested by "Lee Jones" renaming variable field >>>>>>> to appropriate name. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhao Ye >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 15 ++++++++++----- >>>>>>> include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h | 10 ++++++++-- >>>>>>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c >>>>>>> index d495737..66347be 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c >>>>>>> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int device_irq_init_800(struct >>>>>>> pm80x_chip *chip) >>>>>>> { >>>>>>> struct regmap *map = chip->regmap; >>>>>>> unsigned long flags = IRQF_ONESHOT; >>>>>>> - int data, mask, ret = -EINVAL; >>>>>>> + int irq_clr_mode, mask, ret = -EINVAL; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> if (!map || !chip->irq) { >>>>>>> dev_err(chip->dev, "incorrect parameters\n"); >>>>>>> @@ -382,15 +382,16 @@ static int device_irq_init_800(struct >>>>>>> pm80x_chip *chip) >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /* >>>>>>> - * irq_mode defines the way of clearing interrupt. it's >>>>>>> read-clear by >>>>>>> - * default. >>>>>>> + * irq_clr_on_wr defines the way of clearing interrupt by >>>>>>> + * read/write(0/1). It's read-clear by default. >>>>>>> */ >>>>>>> mask = >>>>>>> PM800_WAKEUP2_INV_INT | PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_CLEAR | >>>>>>> PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_MASK; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - data = PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_CLEAR; >>>>>>> - ret = regmap_update_bits(map, PM800_WAKEUP2, mask, data); >>>>>>> + irq_clr_mode = chip->irq_clr_method == PM800_IRQ_CLR_ON_WRITE ? >>>>>>> + PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_WRITE_CLEAR : >>>>>>> PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_READ_CLEAR; >>>>>>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(map, PM800_WAKEUP2, mask, >>>>>>> irq_clr_mode); >>>>>> >>>>>> What's stopping you just passing PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_WRITE_CLEAR or >>>>>> PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_READ_CLEAR from pdata? Then you can use the value >>>>>> directly without all of this faffing about. >>>>>> >>>>>> regmap_update_bits(map, PM800_WAKEUP2, mask, pdata->irq_clr_mode); >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Because "irq_clr_method" is of boolean type. >>>>> And macros which you are referring to is, >>>>> >>>>> #define PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_READ_CLEAR (0 << 1) >>>>> #define PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_WRITE_CLEAR (1 << 1) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And also, I feel it is more cleaner approach with the current code as >>>>> register definition and userflag are maintained separately. >>>> >>>> I see your point, although it's a shame we have to have this code in >>>> its place. >>>> >>>> One thing I think you can do though is rid chip->irq_clr_method, just >>>> use the one you already have in pdata. >>>> >>> >>> Looking at the current code, >>> Yes, this can be done, but I have to do some more changes around it, >>> to make code cleaner, >>> >>> change the signature of >>> >>> static int device_irq_init_800(struct pm80x_chip *chip) >>> >>> TO >>> >>> static int device_irq_init_800(struct pm80x_chip *chip, struct >>> pm80x_platform_data *pdata) >>> >>> >>> and then only use pdata->irq_clr_method. >>> >>> >>> How do you want to get this inside? V6 version? or separate patch? >>> >>> I have one more cleanup patch in the queue, which I am planning to >>> submit today, if you are ok then I can submit along with that. >> >> Ideally not. Don't you save the 'struct device' into *chip? You >> should use that to fetch the pdata, like: >> >> pdata = dev_get_platdata(chip->dev); >> > > Yes certainly, this is another option (rather preferred one). > > But to be consistent with other's I proposed this, please refer to the > fn device_800_init(), where all xxx_init() are taking 2 arguments, and > second argument is pdata. > > > There is room for cleanup, I agree. > I can put this too in the next cleanup series. > Note that this is init function, called from probe. So both approach looks ok to me. Thanks, Vaibhav From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vaibhav Hiremath Subject: Re: [PATCH-V5 3/4] mfd: 88pm800: Set default interrupt clear method Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 16:55:27 +0530 Message-ID: <559BB727.2070106@linaro.org> References: <1435591877-18214-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <1435591877-18214-4-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <20150707072958.GN3182@x1> <559BA1AE.9050006@linaro.org> <20150707104028.GR3182@x1> <559BAF23.90002@linaro.org> <20150707111248.GU3182@x1> <559BB58E.9010406@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <559BB58E.9010406-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, yizhang-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, Zhao Ye List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 07 July 2015 04:48 PM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > > > On Tuesday 07 July 2015 04:42 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>> On Tuesday 07 July 2015 04:10 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>>> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday 07 July 2015 12:59 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> As per the spec, bit 1 (INT_CLEAR_MODE) of reg addr 0xe >>>>>>> (page 0) controls the method of clearing interrupt >>>>>>> status of 88pm800 family of devices; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 0: clear on read >>>>>>> 1: clear on write >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If pdata is not coming from board file, then set the >>>>>>> default irq clear method to "irq clear on write" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, as suggested by "Lee Jones" renaming variable field >>>>>>> to appropriate name. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhao Ye >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 15 ++++++++++----- >>>>>>> include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h | 10 ++++++++-- >>>>>>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c >>>>>>> index d495737..66347be 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c >>>>>>> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int device_irq_init_800(struct >>>>>>> pm80x_chip *chip) >>>>>>> { >>>>>>> struct regmap *map = chip->regmap; >>>>>>> unsigned long flags = IRQF_ONESHOT; >>>>>>> - int data, mask, ret = -EINVAL; >>>>>>> + int irq_clr_mode, mask, ret = -EINVAL; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> if (!map || !chip->irq) { >>>>>>> dev_err(chip->dev, "incorrect parameters\n"); >>>>>>> @@ -382,15 +382,16 @@ static int device_irq_init_800(struct >>>>>>> pm80x_chip *chip) >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /* >>>>>>> - * irq_mode defines the way of clearing interrupt. it's >>>>>>> read-clear by >>>>>>> - * default. >>>>>>> + * irq_clr_on_wr defines the way of clearing interrupt by >>>>>>> + * read/write(0/1). It's read-clear by default. >>>>>>> */ >>>>>>> mask = >>>>>>> PM800_WAKEUP2_INV_INT | PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_CLEAR | >>>>>>> PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_MASK; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - data = PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_CLEAR; >>>>>>> - ret = regmap_update_bits(map, PM800_WAKEUP2, mask, data); >>>>>>> + irq_clr_mode = chip->irq_clr_method == PM800_IRQ_CLR_ON_WRITE ? >>>>>>> + PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_WRITE_CLEAR : >>>>>>> PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_READ_CLEAR; >>>>>>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(map, PM800_WAKEUP2, mask, >>>>>>> irq_clr_mode); >>>>>> >>>>>> What's stopping you just passing PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_WRITE_CLEAR or >>>>>> PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_READ_CLEAR from pdata? Then you can use the value >>>>>> directly without all of this faffing about. >>>>>> >>>>>> regmap_update_bits(map, PM800_WAKEUP2, mask, pdata->irq_clr_mode); >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Because "irq_clr_method" is of boolean type. >>>>> And macros which you are referring to is, >>>>> >>>>> #define PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_READ_CLEAR (0 << 1) >>>>> #define PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_WRITE_CLEAR (1 << 1) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And also, I feel it is more cleaner approach with the current code as >>>>> register definition and userflag are maintained separately. >>>> >>>> I see your point, although it's a shame we have to have this code in >>>> its place. >>>> >>>> One thing I think you can do though is rid chip->irq_clr_method, just >>>> use the one you already have in pdata. >>>> >>> >>> Looking at the current code, >>> Yes, this can be done, but I have to do some more changes around it, >>> to make code cleaner, >>> >>> change the signature of >>> >>> static int device_irq_init_800(struct pm80x_chip *chip) >>> >>> TO >>> >>> static int device_irq_init_800(struct pm80x_chip *chip, struct >>> pm80x_platform_data *pdata) >>> >>> >>> and then only use pdata->irq_clr_method. >>> >>> >>> How do you want to get this inside? V6 version? or separate patch? >>> >>> I have one more cleanup patch in the queue, which I am planning to >>> submit today, if you are ok then I can submit along with that. >> >> Ideally not. Don't you save the 'struct device' into *chip? You >> should use that to fetch the pdata, like: >> >> pdata = dev_get_platdata(chip->dev); >> > > Yes certainly, this is another option (rather preferred one). > > But to be consistent with other's I proposed this, please refer to the > fn device_800_init(), where all xxx_init() are taking 2 arguments, and > second argument is pdata. > > > There is room for cleanup, I agree. > I can put this too in the next cleanup series. > Note that this is init function, called from probe. So both approach looks ok to me. Thanks, Vaibhav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org (Vaibhav Hiremath) Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 16:55:27 +0530 Subject: [PATCH-V5 3/4] mfd: 88pm800: Set default interrupt clear method In-Reply-To: <559BB58E.9010406@linaro.org> References: <1435591877-18214-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <1435591877-18214-4-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <20150707072958.GN3182@x1> <559BA1AE.9050006@linaro.org> <20150707104028.GR3182@x1> <559BAF23.90002@linaro.org> <20150707111248.GU3182@x1> <559BB58E.9010406@linaro.org> Message-ID: <559BB727.2070106@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 07 July 2015 04:48 PM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > > > On Tuesday 07 July 2015 04:42 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>> On Tuesday 07 July 2015 04:10 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>>> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday 07 July 2015 12:59 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> As per the spec, bit 1 (INT_CLEAR_MODE) of reg addr 0xe >>>>>>> (page 0) controls the method of clearing interrupt >>>>>>> status of 88pm800 family of devices; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 0: clear on read >>>>>>> 1: clear on write >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If pdata is not coming from board file, then set the >>>>>>> default irq clear method to "irq clear on write" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, as suggested by "Lee Jones" renaming variable field >>>>>>> to appropriate name. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhao Ye >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 15 ++++++++++----- >>>>>>> include/linux/mfd/88pm80x.h | 10 ++++++++-- >>>>>>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c >>>>>>> index d495737..66347be 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c >>>>>>> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int device_irq_init_800(struct >>>>>>> pm80x_chip *chip) >>>>>>> { >>>>>>> struct regmap *map = chip->regmap; >>>>>>> unsigned long flags = IRQF_ONESHOT; >>>>>>> - int data, mask, ret = -EINVAL; >>>>>>> + int irq_clr_mode, mask, ret = -EINVAL; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> if (!map || !chip->irq) { >>>>>>> dev_err(chip->dev, "incorrect parameters\n"); >>>>>>> @@ -382,15 +382,16 @@ static int device_irq_init_800(struct >>>>>>> pm80x_chip *chip) >>>>>>> } >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /* >>>>>>> - * irq_mode defines the way of clearing interrupt. it's >>>>>>> read-clear by >>>>>>> - * default. >>>>>>> + * irq_clr_on_wr defines the way of clearing interrupt by >>>>>>> + * read/write(0/1). It's read-clear by default. >>>>>>> */ >>>>>>> mask = >>>>>>> PM800_WAKEUP2_INV_INT | PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_CLEAR | >>>>>>> PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_MASK; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - data = PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_CLEAR; >>>>>>> - ret = regmap_update_bits(map, PM800_WAKEUP2, mask, data); >>>>>>> + irq_clr_mode = chip->irq_clr_method == PM800_IRQ_CLR_ON_WRITE ? >>>>>>> + PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_WRITE_CLEAR : >>>>>>> PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_READ_CLEAR; >>>>>>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(map, PM800_WAKEUP2, mask, >>>>>>> irq_clr_mode); >>>>>> >>>>>> What's stopping you just passing PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_WRITE_CLEAR or >>>>>> PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_READ_CLEAR from pdata? Then you can use the value >>>>>> directly without all of this faffing about. >>>>>> >>>>>> regmap_update_bits(map, PM800_WAKEUP2, mask, pdata->irq_clr_mode); >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Because "irq_clr_method" is of boolean type. >>>>> And macros which you are referring to is, >>>>> >>>>> #define PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_READ_CLEAR (0 << 1) >>>>> #define PM800_WAKEUP2_INT_WRITE_CLEAR (1 << 1) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And also, I feel it is more cleaner approach with the current code as >>>>> register definition and userflag are maintained separately. >>>> >>>> I see your point, although it's a shame we have to have this code in >>>> its place. >>>> >>>> One thing I think you can do though is rid chip->irq_clr_method, just >>>> use the one you already have in pdata. >>>> >>> >>> Looking at the current code, >>> Yes, this can be done, but I have to do some more changes around it, >>> to make code cleaner, >>> >>> change the signature of >>> >>> static int device_irq_init_800(struct pm80x_chip *chip) >>> >>> TO >>> >>> static int device_irq_init_800(struct pm80x_chip *chip, struct >>> pm80x_platform_data *pdata) >>> >>> >>> and then only use pdata->irq_clr_method. >>> >>> >>> How do you want to get this inside? V6 version? or separate patch? >>> >>> I have one more cleanup patch in the queue, which I am planning to >>> submit today, if you are ok then I can submit along with that. >> >> Ideally not. Don't you save the 'struct device' into *chip? You >> should use that to fetch the pdata, like: >> >> pdata = dev_get_platdata(chip->dev); >> > > Yes certainly, this is another option (rather preferred one). > > But to be consistent with other's I proposed this, please refer to the > fn device_800_init(), where all xxx_init() are taking 2 arguments, and > second argument is pdata. > > > There is room for cleanup, I agree. > I can put this too in the next cleanup series. > Note that this is init function, called from probe. So both approach looks ok to me. Thanks, Vaibhav