From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] libxl: Remove linux udev rules Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:35:23 +0100 Message-ID: <55A53A4B.3060805@eu.citrix.com> References: <1436179903-449-1-git-send-email-george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> <1436179903-449-3-git-send-email-george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> <20150707113952.GT1134@zion.uk.xensource.com> <20150714161320.GA21149@andromeda.dapyr.net> <1436890874.11153.14.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1436890874.11153.14.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Ian Jackson , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Wei Liu , Roger Pau Monne List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/14/2015 05:21 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 12:13 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:39:52PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:51:39AM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >>>> They are no longer needed, having been replaced by a daemon for >>>> driverdomains which will run scripts as necessary. >> >> This introduces an regression. The 'daemon for driverdomains' >> is xenbackendd - which only gets built for NetBSD. > > It's not (any more), it's "xl devd", which should be built everywhere. Aha! I knew I'd seen it somewhere. In that case, do we actually still need xenbackendd? Or does xenbackendd do something slightly different? > One thing which is missing is an initscript to launch this, it probably > wants to be a new xendriverdomain or something since dom0 doesn't need > this so xencommons would be wrong. ...and xencommons starts a bunch of things which should *not* be in driver domains, like xenstored, xenconsoled, &c. -George