From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/17] xen/arm: ITS: implement hw_irq_controller for LPIs Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:19:33 +0200 Message-ID: <55A6A435.2010500@citrix.com> References: <1436514172-3263-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <1436514172-3263-6-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1436514172-3263-6-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: vijay.kilari@gmail.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com, Vijaya Kumar K , manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Vijay, On 10/07/2015 09:42, vijay.kilari@gmail.com wrote: > +static void its_host_irq_end(struct irq_desc *desc) > +{ > + /* Lower the priority */ > + gicv3_eoi_irq(desc); > + /* Deactivate */ > + gicv3_dir_irq(desc); > +} I though that an LPI doesn't have active state. And therefore, deactivate is not necessary. Did I miss something? Regards, -- Julien Grall