From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933132AbbGUPT1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:19:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:34669 "EHLO mail-pd0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932629AbbGUPTX (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:19:23 -0400 Message-ID: <55AE62F2.4050403@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:49:14 +0530 From: Vaibhav Hiremath User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones CC: Mark Brown , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 regulator support References: <1437070618-21330-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <1437070618-21330-5-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <20150716213429.GE1602@sirena.org.uk> <55A895AC.8070101@linaro.org> <20150717111733.GL11162@sirena.org.uk> <55A8F859.2090204@linaro.org> <20150720073011.GA3061@x1> <55ACE2FC.2090801@linaro.org> <20150721092148.GI3061@x1> <55AE29DF.10102@linaro.org> <20150721151314.GM3061@x1> In-Reply-To: <20150721151314.GM3061@x1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 21 July 2015 08:43 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > >> >> >> On Tuesday 21 July 2015 02:51 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Monday 20 July 2015 01:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Friday 17 July 2015 04:47 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:12:04AM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you merge this into regulator tree? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Link to MFD - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/16/704 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I need a tag I can pull from Lee. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Great. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lee, >>>>>> It would be helpful, if you could ack below patch, >>>>>> >>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/16/704 >>>>> >>>>> These patches are yet to be reviewed. I will unmark those patches as >>>>> important (meaning they will not be reviewed during this iteration). >>>>> Please resubmit a single patch-set containing all of the >>>>> dependencies and Mark and I will work it out between us. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ok, >>>> >>>> I have just sent single patch, which has dependency on regulator >>>> changes. Please review, ack and queue up. >>> >>> A little presumptuous, don't you think? ;) >>> >>>> [PATCH-v3] mfd: 88pm80x: Add 88pm860 chip type support >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6826531/ >>> >>> So nothing depends on this anymore, right? >>> >> >> No, regulato patch depends on this. >> Mark needs your tag in order to take above patch through regulator tree. > > That's not how we usually do things. > > However, as this patch is a very simple one, it shouldn't cause too > many issues if it were to go in via the Regulator tree. > Thanks for your ack. And I understand your concern, but not sure how would you solve such dependency? Another point which keeps bugging me is, git-bisect. Thanks, Vaibhav >> Just to clarify more, >> >> I have regulator patch which adds support for 88PM860 >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/16/719 >> >> which depends on above patch >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6826531/ >> >> Thanks, >> Vaibhav >> > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org (Vaibhav Hiremath) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:49:14 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: 88pm800: Add 88pm860 regulator support In-Reply-To: <20150721151314.GM3061@x1> References: <1437070618-21330-1-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <1437070618-21330-5-git-send-email-vaibhav.hiremath@linaro.org> <20150716213429.GE1602@sirena.org.uk> <55A895AC.8070101@linaro.org> <20150717111733.GL11162@sirena.org.uk> <55A8F859.2090204@linaro.org> <20150720073011.GA3061@x1> <55ACE2FC.2090801@linaro.org> <20150721092148.GI3061@x1> <55AE29DF.10102@linaro.org> <20150721151314.GM3061@x1> Message-ID: <55AE62F2.4050403@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 21 July 2015 08:43 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > >> >> >> On Tuesday 21 July 2015 02:51 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Monday 20 July 2015 01:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Friday 17 July 2015 04:47 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:12:04AM +0530, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you merge this into regulator tree? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Link to MFD - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/16/704 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I need a tag I can pull from Lee. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Great. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lee, >>>>>> It would be helpful, if you could ack below patch, >>>>>> >>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/16/704 >>>>> >>>>> These patches are yet to be reviewed. I will unmark those patches as >>>>> important (meaning they will not be reviewed during this iteration). >>>>> Please resubmit a single patch-set containing all of the >>>>> dependencies and Mark and I will work it out between us. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ok, >>>> >>>> I have just sent single patch, which has dependency on regulator >>>> changes. Please review, ack and queue up. >>> >>> A little presumptuous, don't you think? ;) >>> >>>> [PATCH-v3] mfd: 88pm80x: Add 88pm860 chip type support >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6826531/ >>> >>> So nothing depends on this anymore, right? >>> >> >> No, regulato patch depends on this. >> Mark needs your tag in order to take above patch through regulator tree. > > That's not how we usually do things. > > However, as this patch is a very simple one, it shouldn't cause too > many issues if it were to go in via the Regulator tree. > Thanks for your ack. And I understand your concern, but not sure how would you solve such dependency? Another point which keeps bugging me is, git-bisect. Thanks, Vaibhav >> Just to clarify more, >> >> I have regulator patch which adds support for 88PM860 >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/16/719 >> >> which depends on above patch >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6826531/ >> >> Thanks, >> Vaibhav >> >