From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sagi Grimberg Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 4/9] svcrdma: Use max_sge_rd for destination read depths Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 12:58:59 +0300 Message-ID: <55B4AF63.3040108@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <20150724161331.25617.8475.stgit@build2.ogc.int> <20150724161837.25617.48584.stgit@build2.ogc.int> <00d301d0c641$c2fcb6a0$48f623e0$@opengridcomputing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <00d301d0c641$c2fcb6a0$48f623e0$@opengridcomputing.com> Sender: target-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Steve Wise , dledford@redhat.com Cc: infinipath@intel.com, sagig@mellanox.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, roid@mellanox.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, eli@mellanox.com, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org >> @@ -1059,6 +1062,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_rdma_accept(struct svc_xprt *xprt) >> ntohs(((struct sockaddr_in *)&newxprt->sc_cm_id-> >> route.addr.dst_addr)->sin_port), >> newxprt->sc_max_sge, >> + newxprt->sc_max_sge_rd, >> newxprt->sc_sq_depth, >> newxprt->sc_max_requests, >> newxprt->sc_ord); >> > > With the above patch change, we have no more users of the recently created rdma_cap_read_multi_sge(). Should I add a patch to remove it? Yes please.