From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
	by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2781764A3
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:40:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
	by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2015 04:40:56 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,584,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="775165934"
Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.143])
	([10.237.68.143])
	by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2015 04:40:55 -0700
Message-ID: <55BB5F06.4010901@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:41:58 +0300
From: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andre McCurdy <armccurdy@gmail.com>
References: <1436426071-3790-1-git-send-email-leimaohui@cn.fujitsu.com>	<56502.10.252.20.69.1436441609.squirrel@linux.intel.com>	<CAP9ODKqHNtENns2SOk-C9S2hh1weyf15=n1V8Rxgs+Rh5rMJGw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJTo0Layj-AXfYMmvqjZ-ASSDx_PptbysS7tUiGDLAyPjLGN5A@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJ86T=WJiNC5fJj+Vgj=4T-dS+E9_CvTw79nFLVuFETxrp1qdw@mail.gmail.com>	<1436601450.3310.27.camel@linuxfoundation.org>	<55BA134F.9010908@linux.intel.com>
	<CAJ86T=UHTjTA7S_4EV66VEUoaRhYmaYveVcfxbqzVJsxZ4s6dg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ86T=UHTjTA7S_4EV66VEUoaRhYmaYveVcfxbqzVJsxZ4s6dg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: OE Core mailing list <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: meta-gplv2? [Was Re: parted_1.8.6.bb: add parted that not GPLv3]
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:40:58 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 07/31/2015 02:14 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:

> The number of high quality recipes which can be maintained in oe-core
> depends on the number of developers actively using and contributing to
> oe-core. More active developers means more recipes can be maintained
> to a high quality.

My issue here is quality control. Someone still has to review the work 
of those volunteer developers, and take action when they fail to take 
action. Yocto at the moment does not have such a self-sustaining 
community process - it all still goes through 'core' oe-core developers, 
and those developers can't have any more workload.


Alex