From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751896AbbHQWSG (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:18:06 -0400
Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:55548 "EHLO mail.zytor.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751206AbbHQWSF (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:18:05 -0400
Message-ID: <55D25D7F.40503@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:17:35 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes
References: <20150814071500.GA2678@gmail.com>	<CA+55aFwP6gJ5Qh7btvf_gME35nvR-se==MuRcvctDqdxEQ9SJA@mail.gmail.com>	<20150817080143.GA16928@gmail.com>	<CA+55aFw4pjStVG6zqqS7VCeWvqH+mKcGV_CwqqyRbB1NGcZqug@mail.gmail.com>	<F96A2BC9-B57F-4360-9DF2-A252BB9462B7@zytor.com> <CA+55aFwjbXFKE0u0stUV1s0E-3MrQ4HAcXMCPiaOjqZps5wWJQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwjbXFKE0u0stUV1s0E-3MrQ4HAcXMCPiaOjqZps5wWJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 08/17/2015 10:17 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:58 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>> That is not true.  It *does* work, and I have tested it fairly recently.
> 
> Ok, so it's not too badly broken. Good.
> 
> Also, while it's been a long time since we needed FPU emulation on the
> i486sx, I don't recall the details of any of the (much more modern)
> IoT small cores. I *think* the base platforms are all at a Pentium
> level (ie not just FPU, but MMX), but maybe there's some reason to
> keep FP emulation alive for some platforms.
> 

I just went back and looked at my records... I can guarantee that it
worked as of 743aa456c1834f76982af44e8b71d1a0b2a82e21.

	-hpa