From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FD674242 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 12:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2015 05:11:08 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,469,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="782611221" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2015 05:11:07 -0700 Message-ID: <55E98AC2.7050107@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 15:12:50 +0300 From: Alexander Kanavin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jussi Kukkonen , "Burton, Ross" References: In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] gnome-icon-theme: remove the recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:11:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/04/2015 02:56 PM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > I don't think it's likely but there is a chance that gnome-icon-theme > contained icons that Adwaita does not provide (comparing them all turned > out to be tricky). So double-checking how pcmanfm looks with Adwaita > might make sense in any case. I just did some tests and indeed pcmanfm looks bad when there is no icon theme at all, or when there is gnome-icon-theme, but looks ok with adwaita. So it needs a soft dependency on that, and gnome-icon-theme can still be dropped. If we find any other app that needs icons, then adwaita is the provider (which reminds me, I need to put the same dependency into epiphany recipe). Alex