From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752009AbbIQLap (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:30:45 -0400
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:63178 "EHLO mout.web.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751967AbbIQLal (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:30:41 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: uvc: fix returnvar.cocci warnings
To: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
References: <201509170828.xv0cYNA5%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
 <20150917000130.GA25134@lkp-ib04>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1509171056470.2399@hadrien> <55FAA16C.5070601@samsung.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, kbuild-all@01.org,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55FAA451.9000108@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:30:25 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55FAA16C.5070601@samsung.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:M3EjcqnQDDBrmmQGI2/nVq6FX88hfwxcrt9+o1ZCleqFBZ8ABwj
 Aw1uPE6bSY4DSgvPCnlkMiJ3euAWIcGxN+rjEUor2MWMZaIdMt1k/a8A7ajooAH5EF66rk0
 7OzCn52Vt+cVsdlDrgVhG1wTVMoP223nfbw2VHZ3QSqua6Pn3+uikS4L7SuMbeMKxTRzSuw
 TR90AV378Jd6f0cAsJx6Q==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:a4tcpYONVXk=:fbu5CP2tE1vZYc5kEDUIvW
 /9kRClGDrSwfmji6PUxB7ySOOeOivsiJyZSBV5jzr6XU4Bg4wVjEPU3CjELgFHXXw1Q3/XgvU
 oPQOVYrSlwWXRIaPwOCqcA3blv4WkKSitOuyenxw/gjNC+LXsA1nMI243R4fVEPlM3DaDqwZ9
 eRXyj5cfeKXSxyIq/MTtX971DxGpyq0lH6lbuRo/J8nb9bXRy/fTRbhtsSoRcLyi/T8XNjKW3
 MWJzQWRZZEsk8IyNmi2eNyYbaw08aXs9nbIdniXacqpKZNHqm43jdUCHs7aP4+c0TLh7NU1AD
 OGpU/lOG9BkOx/oT+mPCYWbFGLOuGmKKgNyyrORB4k4TNfpzAgU4tJzUWH24Vd6k7AwmfOy5h
 Rxobhh0wl6d8JfFsaLeXn1Wt9/ccwudYhVMYZAoc+W9ZZ4D4unwoktXiYBCxZkWoTZeE8scc8
 S638h780QV51TmClEA5SrffJZN0uKoNAcfteOtdAxWGDA1q8rhI42n0v2Vv+oW7tErVlPf/Gc
 YK3tlmgsZSve5loMO7oICutTFqL6s64ldvhqltLLjb/rwZ5hz4rmGElyd8aum56xjkJIxJ7/C
 Ve023xP+04yXX+e8Okh5toOdBGPoFlufi/6HJM/B/drEc66ZWvIQHCvjlW0KuCremokTFrCRd
 eiKxeBiEx6YtwlFhULOTR6QepsMVJzgCksPhZOM405S86laLbewtMIKOvQ/HAZr59Rx663d1Q
 UVeOLiWV0zgbgz09cRYHfryjoUwN4X4DW2oo3w==
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Fortunately it does not matter anyway because the return value
> of the drop_link() operation is silently ignored by its caller in
> fs/configfs/symlink.c, functions configfs_symlink() and configfs_unlink().

Should such an implementation detail be also reconsidered once more?

Regards,
Markus