From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D40CC433F5 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EBC26056B for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:53:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 6EBC26056B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ifm0a6+FS4R5h66Pan53lr2F6fL/Qv9E9G5KShJ7F8A=; b=eQ5uS25MfHj8hFiT4vWU4d9cdn aVPoK8ws9JYqLWnyOe6JjlNLiaiZ7KlrAMeX7rXIf2XBz0085+obUKS2vwxLDCkFnc3wnm+2y9a9I +VWb67IaFxQjqfvbJNiUriI247rVxFk76dJHaWHKVtyzx+5hu9BIWNhhFE5JhSVtfrh+J73KlSest o7WrFOM1jGK15SgNtOdL+j3ZnR4MO+zLiUfdmr8yp8ujEdvedPLZwPvR85KAK98Rh25XJ+9hOuSrm A730NjtrnR1fdmH/Rc5ptLDIVn//gvFpIt+tYB6pgD538/5Ele/MQlhLdrhtqKjRMFWCea+oUZh7H v202YiGg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhTzS-00FsvO-BR; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 09:52:30 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhTzO-00FsuX-Vl for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 09:52:28 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C4D106F; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 02:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.47.15] (unknown [10.57.47.15]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBD0F3F719; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 02:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] arm64: export this_cpu_has_cap To: Will Deacon Cc: Catalin Marinas , Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Poirier , Anshuman Khandual , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , David Brazdil , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman References: <20211029113023.760421-1-arnd@kernel.org> <9d4e09b4-47dc-ed3c-2b6d-e0d1a081e592@arm.com> <20211101090143.GA27181@willie-the-truck> <20211101094045.GB27400@willie-the-truck> From: Suzuki K Poulose Message-ID: <55cc7816-cc7a-3161-71cc-0c969ec131a2@arm.com> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:52:22 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211101094045.GB27400@willie-the-truck> Content-Language: en-GB X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211101_025227_158895_2E3BDD36 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.12 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 01/11/2021 09:40, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:34:08AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >> On 01/11/2021 09:01, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:06:23PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 02:31:23PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >>>>> On 29/10/2021 12:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>>> From: Arnd Bergmann >>>>>> >>>>>> It's now used in a coresight driver that can be a loadable module: >>>>>> >>>>>> ERROR: modpost: "this_cpu_has_cap" [drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.ko] undefined! >>>>>> >>>>>> Fixes: 8a1065127d95 ("coresight: trbe: Add infrastructure for Errata handling") >>>>> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose >>>>> Tested-by: Suzuki K Poulose >>>>> >>>>> Will, Catalin, Mathieu, >>>>> >>>>> Do you have a preference on how this fix can be pulled in ? This may >>>>> be safe to go via coresight tree if it is not too late. Otherwise, >>>>> it could go via the arm64 tree. >>>> >>>> I think Will already closed/tagged the arm64 tree for the upcoming >>>> merging window, though he could take it as a fix afterwards. >>>> >>>> If it doesn't conflict with the arm64 for-next/core, it's fine by me to >>>> go through the coresight tree. >>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Not sure if we actually want this to be exported, this is my local >>>>>> workaround for the randconfig build bot. >>>>>> --- >>>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 + >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c >>>>>> index ecbdff795f5e..beccbcfa7391 100644 >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c >>>>>> @@ -2864,6 +2864,7 @@ bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int n) >>>>>> return false; >>>>>> } >>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(this_cpu_has_cap); >>>> >>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL? I think this_cpu_has_cap() is a bit more more >>>> specialised than cpus_have_const_cap(). >>>> >>>> With that: >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas >>> >>> Yes, at this stage I think it's best for this to go via the Coresight tree. >>> So with the _GPL export: >>> >>> Acked-by: Will Deacon >>> >>> If that doesn't work for some reason, I can take it next week after the >>> initial arm64 queue has been merged. Please just let me know. >> >> As I understand correctly, this will now need to go via arm64 tree. The >> CoreSight tree changes are pulled into Greg's tree and the next it will >> happen is for the next release. Usually the fixes don't end up there >> during the -rc cycles. So, I believe it is better if this goes via >> arm64. > > Hmm, are you saying that Coresight drivers don't receive fixes outside of > the merge window? That sounds sub-optimal... Unfortunately thats how it works today. We should fix this. Mathieu, Greg, Do you have any thoughts on how to address this ? > > But in any case, I'm happy to take this as long as it can wait until the > second half of the merge window. Yes, please. Thats the quickest path to merging this patch. Suzuki _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726BDC433FE for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524036056B for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233379AbhKAJ47 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2021 05:56:59 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:36864 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232906AbhKAJzA (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2021 05:55:00 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C4D106F; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 02:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.47.15] (unknown [10.57.47.15]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBD0F3F719; Mon, 1 Nov 2021 02:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] arm64: export this_cpu_has_cap To: Will Deacon Cc: Catalin Marinas , Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Poirier , Anshuman Khandual , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , David Brazdil , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman References: <20211029113023.760421-1-arnd@kernel.org> <9d4e09b4-47dc-ed3c-2b6d-e0d1a081e592@arm.com> <20211101090143.GA27181@willie-the-truck> <20211101094045.GB27400@willie-the-truck> From: Suzuki K Poulose Message-ID: <55cc7816-cc7a-3161-71cc-0c969ec131a2@arm.com> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:52:22 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211101094045.GB27400@willie-the-truck> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/11/2021 09:40, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:34:08AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >> On 01/11/2021 09:01, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:06:23PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 02:31:23PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >>>>> On 29/10/2021 12:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>>> From: Arnd Bergmann >>>>>> >>>>>> It's now used in a coresight driver that can be a loadable module: >>>>>> >>>>>> ERROR: modpost: "this_cpu_has_cap" [drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.ko] undefined! >>>>>> >>>>>> Fixes: 8a1065127d95 ("coresight: trbe: Add infrastructure for Errata handling") >>>>> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose >>>>> Tested-by: Suzuki K Poulose >>>>> >>>>> Will, Catalin, Mathieu, >>>>> >>>>> Do you have a preference on how this fix can be pulled in ? This may >>>>> be safe to go via coresight tree if it is not too late. Otherwise, >>>>> it could go via the arm64 tree. >>>> >>>> I think Will already closed/tagged the arm64 tree for the upcoming >>>> merging window, though he could take it as a fix afterwards. >>>> >>>> If it doesn't conflict with the arm64 for-next/core, it's fine by me to >>>> go through the coresight tree. >>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Not sure if we actually want this to be exported, this is my local >>>>>> workaround for the randconfig build bot. >>>>>> --- >>>>>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 + >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c >>>>>> index ecbdff795f5e..beccbcfa7391 100644 >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c >>>>>> @@ -2864,6 +2864,7 @@ bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int n) >>>>>> return false; >>>>>> } >>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(this_cpu_has_cap); >>>> >>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL? I think this_cpu_has_cap() is a bit more more >>>> specialised than cpus_have_const_cap(). >>>> >>>> With that: >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas >>> >>> Yes, at this stage I think it's best for this to go via the Coresight tree. >>> So with the _GPL export: >>> >>> Acked-by: Will Deacon >>> >>> If that doesn't work for some reason, I can take it next week after the >>> initial arm64 queue has been merged. Please just let me know. >> >> As I understand correctly, this will now need to go via arm64 tree. The >> CoreSight tree changes are pulled into Greg's tree and the next it will >> happen is for the next release. Usually the fixes don't end up there >> during the -rc cycles. So, I believe it is better if this goes via >> arm64. > > Hmm, are you saying that Coresight drivers don't receive fixes outside of > the merge window? That sounds sub-optimal... Unfortunately thats how it works today. We should fix this. Mathieu, Greg, Do you have any thoughts on how to address this ? > > But in any case, I'm happy to take this as long as it can wait until the > second half of the merge window. Yes, please. Thats the quickest path to merging this patch. Suzuki