From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A1FC433F5 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:37:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4EA6101A for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:37:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5C4EA6101A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:49366 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOcyc-0000CB-Fj for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:37:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOcxn-0007Lh-1Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:36:51 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:28406) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mOcxk-00081E-PS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:36:50 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10102"; a="208268525" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,282,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="208268525" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Sep 2021 02:36:44 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,282,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="694715064" Received: from fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.82]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Sep 2021 02:36:43 -0700 Received: from shsmsx604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) by fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.12; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 02:36:43 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.12; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:36:41 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.012; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:36:41 +0800 From: "Wang, Wei W" To: Ashish Kalra Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 14/14] kvm: Add support for userspace MSR filtering and handling of MSR_KVM_MIGRATION_CONTROL. Thread-Topic: [PATCH v4 14/14] kvm: Add support for userspace MSR filtering and handling of MSR_KVM_MIGRATION_CONTROL. Thread-Index: AQHXiSjPALimUABevkmUGKAVuEWD1qudGp0Q//+VXgCAAIaAEA== Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:36:41 +0000 Message-ID: <55f5f499084b483f8217bc0f0a8049bc@intel.com> References: <67935c3fd5f29a2ba9d67a91255276d3b9ccc99b.1628076205.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com> <20210910091406.GB2686@ashkalra_ubuntu_server> In-Reply-To: <20210910091406.GB2686@ashkalra_ubuntu_server> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=134.134.136.20; envelope-from=wei.w.wang@intel.com; helo=mga02.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com" , "brijesh.singh@amd.com" , "ehabkost@redhat.com" , "jejb@linux.ibm.com" , "tobin@ibm.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "dgilbert@redhat.com" , "dovmurik@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Friday, September 10, 2021 5:14 PM, Ashish Kalra wrote: > > It seems this is enabled/disabled by the guest, which means that the gu= est > can always refuse to be migrated? > > >=20 > Yes. >=20 > Are there any specific concerns/issues with that ? It's kind of wired if everybody rejects to migrate from the guest but they ticked the option "agree to be migrated" when they buy the guest (e.g. at a discounted price). In general, I think the migration decision should be made by the management= s/w, not the migratable guest. Best, Wei