From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Panu Matilainen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for driver directories Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 16:00:41 +0300 Message-ID: <56054579.9010609@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: David Marchand Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC827EB0 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:00:44 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 09/25/2015 03:35 PM, David Marchand wrote: > Hello Panu, > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Panu Matilainen > wrote: > > This mini-series adds support for driver directory concept as > described by Thomas Monjalon back in February: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013285.html > > Panu Matilainen (2): > eal: refactor plugin list append from eal_parse_args() to a helper > function > eal: add support for driver directory concept > > config/common_linuxapp | 3 ++ > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 1 + > lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 76 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > This patchset looks good to me. > Is there any reason why we should only have this for linux ? I merely followed suite with the related, pre-existing -d option which also only exists for Linux. And wondered about the same thing :) - Panu -