From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhe3k-0006m0-Mw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:38:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhe3h-0001ur-Fr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:38:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49812) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zhe3h-0001un-AC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:38:05 -0400 References: <5550716F.2000609@redhat.com> <556849AB.2090505@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <560D3739.1000405@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 15:38:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] clang -fsanitize=undefined warnings in the string visitors List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Luiz Capitulino , Michael Roth , QEMU Developers On 01/10/2015 12:47, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 29 May 2015 at 12:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 29/05/2015 12:56, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>>>>> Paolo: ping^2, since we're out of release freeze now? >>>>> >>>>> I have some patches, but this isn't really the best time for me to post >>>>> them... >>> Ping...has the timing improved? >> >> Almost. :) Next week, promised. > > Ping again, six months later... Uh, I thought they were already in. :) Paolo