From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:14:25 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] modules_object_t vs. modules_dep_t labeling
In-Reply-To: <560D03C1.9060102@redhat.com>
References: <560D03C1.9060102@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <561269A1.7040202@tresys.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 10/1/2015 5:58 AM, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
> We have more and more bugs with mislabeled /lib/modules/*/modules.dep*
> files. There is a default label for them - modules_dep_t but we get them
> labeled as modules_object_t. Yes, we can add filename transition rules
> and also find a reason why they get wrong labeling (in progress).
> 
> But is there a big advantage to have these two labels. At least I don't
> see it from the policy point of view (sesearch).

I'm open to merging them, but would first have to do some further analysis.

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com