All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, felipe.franciosi@citrix.com,
	rafal.mielniczuk@citrix.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org, axboe@fb.com,
	jonathan.davies@citrix.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
	avanzini.arianna@gmail.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] xen/blkfront: convert per device io_lock to per ring ring_lock
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 18:34:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5614F51E.1020404__32846.5922423222$1444214191$gmane$org@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56128587.7000804@citrix.com>


On 10/05/2015 10:13 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 05/09/15 a les 14.39, Bob Liu ha escrit:
>> The per device io_lock became a coarser grained lock after multi-queues/rings
>> was introduced, this patch converts it to a fine-grained per ring lock.
>>
>> NOTE: The per dev_info structure was no more protected by any lock.
> 
> I would rewrite this as:
> 
> Note that the per-device blkfront_dev_info structure is no longer
> protected by any lock.
> 

Will update.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c |   44 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>> index bf45c99..1cae76b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_ring_page_order, "Maximum order of pages to be used for the
>>  struct blkfront_ring_info
>>  {
>>  	struct blkif_front_ring ring;
>> +	spinlock_t ring_lock;
>>  	unsigned int ring_ref[XENBUS_MAX_RING_PAGES];
>>  	unsigned int evtchn, irq;
>>  	struct work_struct work;
>> @@ -141,7 +142,6 @@ struct blkfront_ring_info
>>   * putting all kinds of interesting stuff here :-)
>>   */
>>  struct blkfront_dev_info {
>> -	spinlock_t io_lock;
>>  	struct mutex mutex;
>>  	struct xenbus_device *xbdev;
>>  	struct gendisk *gd;
>> @@ -637,29 +637,28 @@ static int blkif_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>>  			   const struct blk_mq_queue_data *qd)
>>  {
>>  	struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo = (struct blkfront_ring_info *)hctx->driver_data;
>> -	struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo = rinfo->dinfo;
>>  
>>  	blk_mq_start_request(qd->rq);
>> -	spin_lock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
>> +	spin_lock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>>  	if (RING_FULL(&rinfo->ring))
>>  		goto out_busy;
>>  
>> -	if (blkif_request_flush_invalid(qd->rq, dinfo))
>> +	if (blkif_request_flush_invalid(qd->rq, rinfo->dinfo))
>>  		goto out_err;
>>  
>>  	if (blkif_queue_request(qd->rq, rinfo))
>>  		goto out_busy;
>>  
>>  	flush_requests(rinfo);
>> -	spin_unlock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
>> +	spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>>  	return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
>>  
>>  out_err:
>> -	spin_unlock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
>> +	spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>>  	return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_ERROR;
>>  
>>  out_busy:
>> -	spin_unlock_irq(&dinfo->io_lock);
>> +	spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>>  	blk_mq_stop_hw_queue(hctx);
>>  	return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_BUSY;
>>  }
>> @@ -961,7 +960,7 @@ static void xlvbd_release_gendisk(struct blkfront_dev_info *dinfo)
>>  	dinfo->gd = NULL;
>>  }
>>  
>> -/* Must be called with io_lock holded */
>> +/* Must be called with ring_lock holded */
>                                     ^ held.
>>  static void kick_pending_request_queues(struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo)
>>  {
>>  	if (!RING_FULL(&rinfo->ring))
>> @@ -972,10 +971,10 @@ static void blkif_restart_queue(struct work_struct *work)
>>  {
>>  	struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo = container_of(work, struct blkfront_ring_info, work);
>>  
>> -	spin_lock_irq(&rinfo->dinfo->io_lock);
>> +	spin_lock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>>  	if (rinfo->dinfo->connected == BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED)
>>  		kick_pending_request_queues(rinfo);
> 
> This seems wrong, why are you acquiring a per-ring lock in order to
> check a per-device field? IMHO, I think you need to introduce a
> per-device lock or drop the locking around this chunk if it's really not
> needed.
> 

The lock here is to protect kick_pending_request_queues() where we will check RING_FULL().
Will move this lock after the checking of per-device field.

Thanks,
-Bob

>> -	spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->dinfo->io_lock);
>> +	spin_unlock_irq(&rinfo->ring_lock);
>>  }
>>  

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-07 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-05 12:39 [PATCH v3 0/9] xen-block: support multi hardware-queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] xen-blkfront: convert to blk-mq APIs Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` Bob Liu
2015-09-23 20:31   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-23 21:12     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-23 21:12     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-23 20:31   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] xen-block: add document for mutli hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` Bob Liu
2015-09-23 20:32   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-09-23 20:32   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-10-02 16:04   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-02 16:12     ` Wei Liu
2015-10-02 16:12     ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2015-10-02 16:22       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-02 16:22       ` [Xen-devel] " Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-02 23:55         ` Bob Liu
2015-10-02 23:55         ` Bob Liu
2015-10-02 16:04   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] xen/blkfront: separate per ring information out of device info Bob Liu
2015-10-02 17:02   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-03  0:34     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-03  0:34     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 15:17       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-05 15:17       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-10  8:30     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-19  9:42       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-19  9:42       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-10  8:30     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-02 17:02   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] xen/blkfront: pseudo support for multi hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-10-05 10:52   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:28     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 10:28     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 10:52   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] xen/blkfront: convert per device io_lock to per ring ring_lock Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39   ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:13   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-05 14:13   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:34     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 10:34     ` Bob Liu [this message]
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] xen/blkfront: negotiate the number of hw queues/rings with backend Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39   ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:40   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:39     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 10:39     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 11:46       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 12:19         ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 12:19         ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 11:46       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-05 14:40   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] xen/blkback: separate ring information out of struct xen_blkif Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39   ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:55   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:41     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 10:41     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-10  4:08     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-19  9:36       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-19  9:36       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-19 10:03         ` Bob Liu
2015-10-19 10:03         ` Bob Liu
2015-10-10  4:08     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 14:55   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-05 14:55   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-05 14:55   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] xen/blkback: pseudo support for multi hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39   ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 15:08   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-05 15:08   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:50     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 11:49       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 11:49       ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:50     ` Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] xen/blkback: get number of hardware queues/rings from blkfront Bob Liu
2015-09-05 12:39   ` Bob Liu
2015-10-05 15:15   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-05 15:15   ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-07 10:54     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-07 10:54     ` Bob Liu
2015-10-02  9:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] xen-block: support multi hardware-queues/rings Rafal Mielniczuk
2015-10-02  9:57 ` Rafal Mielniczuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='5614F51E.1020404__32846.5922423222$1444214191$gmane$org@oracle.com' \
    --to=bob.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=avanzini.arianna@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=felipe.franciosi@citrix.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafal.mielniczuk@citrix.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.