On 10/12/2015 11:46 AM, Guillaume Picquet wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 12/10/2015 11:15, Marc Kleine-Budde a écrit :
>> On 10/12/2015 11:04 AM, Guillaume Picquet wrote:
>>> Le 12/10/2015 10:54, Marc Kleine-Budde a écrit :
>>>> On 10/12/2015 10:05 AM, Guillaume Picquet wrote:
>>>>> I've received a patched firmware from my provider, tested it and so far
>>>>> so good.
>>>> Good to hear that. Can you send the patches or at91_can.c to the list?
>>> It's your patch I gave my provider.
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git/commit/?h=at91-next&id=7234e9dee7d0df75de7ae14443a2306435750594
>> Ah, good to hear that this works for your usecase aswell. Can I add your
>> Tested-by Tag to the patch?
> Yes why not, But I can not guarantee that my provider did not modify the 
> patch.

Thanks,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |