From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Survey on release cycle
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 06:30:59 -0600
Message-ID: <561E672302000078000AAE59@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
References: <20151012173222.GE2421@zion.uk.xensource.com>
	<1444825271.23192.178.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <JBeulich@suse.com>) id 1ZmLCz-0008IW-9X
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:31:05 +0000
In-Reply-To: <1444825271.23192.178.camel@citrix.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

>>> On 14.10.15 at 14:21, <ian.campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> Aside: I'm a bit confused regarding whether our "stable release scheme" is
> defined in terms of number of concurrently supported releases or in terms
> of an absolute time. 
> http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Maintenance_Releases definitely
> says it is concurrent release based, but your proposal above suggests
> otherwise. Is the wiki wrong?

I think the distinction wasn't relevant with the (intended) 9 month cycle.

Jan