From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-gw3-out.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.64]:55281 "EHLO mail-gw3-out.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751296AbbJWLR0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:17:26 -0400 Message-ID: <562A1743.9080406@broadcom.com> (sfid-20151023_131729_082416_E4188F5D) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:17:23 +0200 From: Arend van Spriel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg , Subject: Re: [PATCH] backports: add ktime_get_seconds() References: <1445584991-11249-1-git-send-email-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <5629FEB3.6050905@broadcom.com> (sfid-20151023_113239_295482_F75BC0A3) <1445592856.1945.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1445592856.1945.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Sender: backports-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/23/2015 11:34 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:32 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> On 10/23/2015 09:23 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: >>> From: Johannes Berg >> >> Already submitted a patch for this. I just did not bother to >> introduce the timekeeping.h file. So yours may be preferred. >> > > Oh, missed that. Yours is better with time64_t though, so we should > probably merge them... Be my guest ;-) > Adding the timekeeping.h file might be required if, in the future, > somebody includes only it instead of ktime.h Yeah. I got the impression that timekeeping.h should not be included directly, but that might not stop people from doing it anyway. Regards, Arend -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe backports" in