From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]:35553 "EHLO mail-oi0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751220AbbJWTbh (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:31:37 -0400 Received: by oifu63 with SMTP id u63so28751656oif.2 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: overlap of devices in rtl8xxxu and rtl8192cu To: Jes Sorensen , Kalle Valo References: <562A2711.9040700@gmail.com> <87ziz91xag.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87oafp1pk6.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87k2qd1ooy.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Cc: Xose Vazquez Perez , linux-wireless From: Larry Finger Message-ID: <562A8B21.2020803@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20151023_213140_469582_42759878) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:31:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/23/2015 12:53 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: > Kalle Valo writes: >> Kalle Valo writes: >> >>> Like I said earlier in rtl8xxxu review, I don't want to have two drivers >>> supporting the same device. So either rtl8xxxu or rtlwifi supports the >>> devices above, not both. And to my knowledge rtl8xxxu is still lacking >>> in features, and it's a new driver, so it's best that rtlwifi continues >>> to support these for the time being. Once rtl8xxxu catches up and we >>> have a clear consensus we can make the switch. >>> >>> I'll send a patch in a jiffy, merge window is getting closer so we don't >>> have any extra time. >> >> Heh, having hilarious problems with my patch: >> >> : host vger.kernel.org[209.132.180.67] said: >> 550 5.7.1 Content-Policy reject msg: The capital Triple-X in subject is way >> too often associated with junk email, please rephrase. >> >> The subject was: >> >> Subject: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: move devices supported by rtlwifi under >> CONFIG_RTL8XXXU_UNTESTED > > This seems a reasonable workaround for now. > > Next time just add some extra buzzwords to the subject line and I am > sure it will go through :) Well, when you try to send porn, the system will complain. :) I agree that this is a sensible workaround. Larry