From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8045176FD0 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 01:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t9T1hLGL018214 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.231] (128.224.162.231) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:43:20 -0700 To: "Burton, Ross" , Alexander Kanavin References: <484dd4883f19d258e29e343f1b0735d2940d7424.1446009435.git.kai.kang@windriver.com> <56309F82.203@windriver.com> <5630A999.1030605@linux.intel.com> From: Kang Kai Message-ID: <563179B8.6070305@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 09:43:20 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] libxml2: fix unsafe memory access X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 01:43:21 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060304000409020304050105" --------------060304000409020304050105 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2015年10月28日 19:15, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 28 October 2015 at 10:55, Alexander Kanavin > > wrote: > > I suppose Backport is the best choice in upstream status [ Pending > Submitted Accepted Backport Denied Inappropriate ]. Though it > is not > from official upstream, it is from somewhere else as listed in > the patch. > > > 'Submitted [where]' is the right choice here, I think. > > > Yes, this is exactly what Submitted is for. OK. I'll send V2. Thanks, Kai > > Ross > > -- Regards, Neil | Kai Kang --------------060304000409020304050105 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 2015年10月28日 19:15, Burton, Ross wrote:

On 28 October 2015 at 10:55, Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
I suppose Backport is the best choice in upstream status [ Pending
Submitted Accepted Backport Denied Inappropriate ]. Though it is not
from official upstream, it is from somewhere else as listed in the patch.

 'Submitted [where]' is the right choice here, I think.

Yes, this is exactly what Submitted is for.

OK. I'll send V2.

Thanks,
Kai


Ross




-- 
Regards,
Neil | Kai Kang
--------------060304000409020304050105--