From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Burlison Subject: Re: [Bug 106241] New: shutdown(3)/close(3) behaviour is incorrect for sockets in accept(3) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 17:12:44 +0000 Message-ID: <5632538C.7070401@oracle.com> References: <201510221951.t9MJp5LC005892@room101.nl.oracle.com> <20151022215741.GW22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <201510230952.t9N9qYZJ021998@room101.nl.oracle.com> <20151024023054.GZ22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <201510270908.t9R9873a001683@room101.nl.oracle.com> <562F577E.6000901@oracle.com> <20151029145847.GA10859@netbsd.org> <563238D0.2040802@oracle.com> <20151029160131.GA18961@netbsd.org> <56324625.9000803@oracle.com> <20151029170748.GG22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , eric.dumazet@gmail.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Return-path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:32073 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757225AbbJ2RMy (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2015 13:12:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20151029170748.GG22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: [off list] On 29/10/2015 17:07, Al Viro wrote: > Could the esteemed sir possibly be ars^H^H^Hprevailed upon to quote the exact > place in POSIX that requires such behaviour? If that's the way the conversation is going to go, sorry, no. -- Alan Burlison --