From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tAA8nhxQ019252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 03:49:44 -0500 Received: from mail.fibbs.org (phineas.fibbs.org [109.234.106.32]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E8E04E for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fibbs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E20200435 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:49:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.fibbs.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.fibbs.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id CukunOolfK9C for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:49:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.178.27] (p5DD7AD86.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.215.173.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.fibbs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0AA6200433 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:49:39 +0100 (CET) References: <563FF33C.3010500@mglug.de> <5640568C.6090009@gmail.com> From: Oliver Rath Message-ID: <5641AFA2.1060209@mglug.de> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:49:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5640568C.6090009@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] [SOLVED] Re: Kombination of lvm-tags Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com Hi Zdenek, On 09.11.2015 09:17, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > Dne 9.11.2015 v 02:13 Oliver Rath napsal(a): >> Hi list, >> >> I see that I can use tags to group LVs together like a set union. So, if >> a couple of LVs have tag @a, another the tag @b, I can see all these LVs >> with >> >> lvs @a @b >> >> If now I want to see the LVs having @a *AND* @b, is this possible? >> >> > > Please check possibilities of --select option. This look like exactly where I looked for! Thank you very much! Regards, Oliver