From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net ([194.109.24.25]:45301 "EHLO lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753901AbbKLJD1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 04:03:27 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] v4l2-device: Don't unregister ACPI/Device Tree based devices To: Sakari Ailus , linux-media@vger.kernel.org References: <564348C1.1050503@xs4all.nl> <1447318867-20537-1-git-send-email-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tommi Franttila From: Hans Verkuil Message-ID: <564455C9.9060909@xs4all.nl> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:03:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1447318867-20537-1-git-send-email-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/12/15 10:01, Sakari Ailus wrote: > From: Tommi Franttila > > When a V4L2 sub-device backed by a DT or ACPI based device was removed, > the device was unregistered as well which certainly was not intentional, > as the client device would not be re-created by simply reinstating the > V4L2 sub-device (indeed the device would have to be there first!). > > Skip unregistering the device in case it has non-NULL of_node or fwnode. > > Signed-off-by: Tommi Franttila > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus > --- > > Hi Hans, > > Thanks for the comment! How about this one? Lovely, thanks! Acked-by: Hans Verkuil > > Regards, > Sakari > > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-device.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-device.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-device.c > index 5b0a30b..7129e43 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-device.c > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-device.c > @@ -118,11 +118,20 @@ void v4l2_device_unregister(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev) > if (sd->flags & V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_IS_I2C) { > struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd); > > - /* We need to unregister the i2c client explicitly. > - We cannot rely on i2c_del_adapter to always > - unregister clients for us, since if the i2c bus > - is a platform bus, then it is never deleted. */ > - if (client) > + /* > + * We need to unregister the i2c client > + * explicitly. We cannot rely on > + * i2c_del_adapter to always unregister > + * clients for us, since if the i2c bus is a > + * platform bus, then it is never deleted. > + * > + * Device tree or ACPI based devices must not > + * be unregistered as they have not been > + * registered by us, and would not be > + * re-created by just probing the V4L2 driver. > + */ > + if (client && > + !client->dev.of_node && !client->dev.fwnode) > i2c_unregister_device(client); > continue; > } > @@ -131,7 +140,7 @@ void v4l2_device_unregister(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev) > if (sd->flags & V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_IS_SPI) { > struct spi_device *spi = v4l2_get_subdevdata(sd); > > - if (spi) > + if (spi && !spi->dev.of_node && !spi->dev.fwnode) > spi_unregister_device(spi); > continue; > } >