From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42]:35491 "EHLO mail-lf0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752493AbbKLRby (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:31:54 -0500 Received: by lfdo63 with SMTP id o63so38246840lfd.2 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:31:52 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab References: <5644AD42.4060904@users.sourceforge.net> <20151112152022.4f212b97@recife.lan> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org From: Alec Leamas Message-ID: <5644CD07.6020303@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:31:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151112152022.4f212b97@recife.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/11/15 18:20, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:16:18 +0300 > Alberto Mardegan escreveu: > Complaining doesn't help at all. We don't read the mailing list to > check for new patches. Instead, we look for them at: > https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/ > > All patches that goes to the ML are automatically stored there, and will be > handled by one of the (sub-)maintainers. > However, if the emailer breaks the patch (with was the case of the > "tv tuner max2165..." patch), patchwork won't recognize it as a > patch, and we'll only see the e-mail by accident. Ah... that explains why nobody cares about my patch[1]... Is there any way around picky emailers? Is putting the patch in an attachment OK? Cheers! --alec [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75751