From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f54.google.com ([209.85.215.54]:35020 "EHLO mail-lf0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750945AbbKLSLh (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:11:37 -0500 Received: by lfdo63 with SMTP id o63so38893641lfd.2 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:11:35 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab References: <5644AD42.4060904@users.sourceforge.net> <20151112152022.4f212b97@recife.lan> <5644CD07.6020303@gmail.com> <20151112154150.33a1979a@recife.lan> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org From: Alec Leamas Message-ID: <5644D656.6070509@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:11:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151112154150.33a1979a@recife.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/11/15 18:41, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:31:51 +0100 > Alec Leamas escreveu: > >> On 12/11/15 18:20, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >>> Em Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:16:18 +0300 >>> Alberto Mardegan escreveu: >> >>> Complaining doesn't help at all. We don't read the mailing list to >>> check for new patches. Instead, we look for them at: >>> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/ So, now you find it?! >>> However, if the emailer breaks the patch (with was the case of the >>> "tv tuner max2165..." patch), patchwork won't recognize it as a >>> patch, and we'll only see the e-mail by accident. >> >> Ah... that explains why nobody cares about my patch[1]... Is there any >> way around picky emailers? > > Use a good one ;) Here, I use claws-mail, with works fine if configured > to send text-only e-mails and to not break long lines. Installing claws-mail for this purpose wasn't too hard. >> Is putting the patch in an attachment OK? > > No, because it doesn't make easy for people to reply with comments. Fair enough. Thanks for newbie help. Cheers! --alec