From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] libxc: reorganize domain builder guest memory allocator Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 05:41:36 +0100 Message-ID: <56456A00.1060907@suse.com> References: <1447335816-31772-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <1447335816-31772-2-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <20151112134807.GK24281@zion.uk.xensource.com> <56449C34.6050408@suse.com> <1447339644.18450.75.camel@citrix.com> <5644AFD2.4010505@suse.com> <20151112155549.GN24281@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151112155549.GN24281@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu Cc: roger.pau@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Ian Campbell , stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/11/15 16:55, Wei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 04:27:14PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 12/11/15 15:47, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 15:03 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>> On 12/11/15 14:48, Wei Liu wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:43:28PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>>> Guest memory allocation in the domain builder of libxc is done via >>>>>> virtual addresses only. In order to be able to support preallocated >>>>>> areas not virtually mapped reorganize the memory allocator to keep >>>>>> track of allocated pages globally and in allocated segments. >>>>>> >>>>>> This requires an interface change of the allocate callback of the >>>>>> domain builder which currently is using the last mapped virtual >>>>>> address as a parameter. This is no problem as the only user of this >>>>>> callback is stubdom/grub/kexec.c using this virtual address to >>>>>> calculate the last used pfn. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross >>>>> >>>>> If you've tested and confirmed pvgrub (stubdom based grub) doesn't >>>>> break: >>>>> >>>>> Acked-by: Wei Liu >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hmm, difficult. Is this ever tested automatically? >>> >>> Yes, see the test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub and test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub >>> jobs in any recent osstest flight (it was added a couple of months back. >>> >>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub/xen-unstable.html >>> >>> suggests it works ok in general. >> >> It doesn't work on any of my test installations I've tried >> so far (3 different installations with 3 different domUs). >> And that's without my patches being active. >> >> In case somebody else is capable of testing pvgrub with >> xen-unstable I'd appreciate testing my patches there! >> > > I played with the pvgrub generated with this series, it can boot Debian > Wheezy stock 3.2 kernel. Thanks for testing this! Juergen