From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6A9762AF; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:24:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Nov 2015 02:24:55 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,302,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="686463865" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Nov 2015 02:24:54 -0800 Message-ID: <5649AF3D.2020106@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:26:05 +0200 From: Alexander Kanavin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Oberritter , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <58488.10.252.13.130.1447346734.squirrel@linux.intel.com> <4335862.fNWyiaI9Bu@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20151113114617.GB2567@jama> <5649A542.8000307@linux.intel.com> <5649AACB.6070204@opendreambox.org> In-Reply-To: <5649AACB.6070204@opendreambox.org> Subject: volunteers for meta-qt4 repo maintenance? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:24:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/16/2015 12:07 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote: >> Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive, >> and complicates administration and maintenance. I'm not going to handle >> those. So I'll make a meta-qt4 layer under meta-oe, and it's fine if >> there is no official maintainer or ongoing build testing for it at least >> until someone volunteers to pick it up. > > Basically everyone agreed on moving qt4 to its own repo. And your > conclusion is to ignore that and move qt4 to meta-openembedded, already > expecting bitrot? Are you willing to be the maintainer of that separate repo? So far no one has stepped up for this job. In this situation, it's better to keep the recipes under meta-openembedded tree and mark them as unmaintained. I'll ask this explicitly - any volunteers for a separate meta-qt4 repository and layer maintenance? Alex