From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages] [and 1 more messages] Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:24:03 -0700 Message-ID: <564A113302000078000B55DE@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> References: <56432D5C02000078000B3B94@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <1447241118.11601.21.camel@citrix.com> <22083.24316.287721.55696@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <22083.26028.806376.677106@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1447258904.18450.26.camel@citrix.com> <5643782D02000078000B3E8A@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <22083.29398.894103.109649@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <22089.64906.343969.189469@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <564A0E4002000078000B55BB@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <22090.257.932029.320862@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyMZf-0002nT-7y for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 16:24:11 +0000 In-Reply-To: <22090.257.932029.320862@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 16.11.15 at 17:14, wrote: > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions - > FAIL [and 1 more messages] [and 1 more messages]"): >> On 16.11.15 at 17:00, wrote: >> > Based on this, which is the only regression in 64287, we could force >> > push this: > ... >> Well, yes, but wouldn't it re-occur once it managed to run on an >> Intel box again? > > Yes, but that's not very likely to happen soon. > > This will allow us to think about the medium-term fix without the > short-term breakage causing pain. Okay. Why don't you go ahead then? Jan