From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:34007 "EHLO mail-wm0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754708AbbKSQVT (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:21:19 -0500 Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so33724974wmv.1 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:21:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <564DF6FB.8040706@gmail.com> (sfid-20151119_172126_878347_FE127158) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:21:15 +0100 From: ferran MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Felix Fietkau , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [question] Rate control algorithm for mesh References: <5649FE1F.4060203@gmail.com> <564A1D7F.6050201@openwrt.org> In-Reply-To: <564A1D7F.6050201@openwrt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 16/11/15 19:16, Felix Fietkau wrote: > > Rate control instances are always per sta (so per 802.11 destination). I totally ignored that. > The problem you are describing either doesn't exist, or is something > different from what you're describing. > I would recommend running a test with latest mac80211 and minstrel(_ht), > it should perform much better than PID. > > - Felix In this case, I'll repeat the experiments with minstrel enabled. We have already planned it. Thank you a lot. Ferran