From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gourmet.spamgourmet.com ([216.75.62.102]:54341 "EHLO gourmet8.spamgourmet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161853AbbKTJii (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2015 04:38:38 -0500 Received: from spamgourmet by gourmet7.spamgourmet.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zzi9N-0001cb-LK for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:38:37 +0000 From: linux-btrfs.tebulin@xoxy.net Subject: Re: Kernel 3.19 and still "disk full" even though 'btrfs fi df" reports enough room left? References: <564CC90F.3060703@gmail.com> <20151118190857.GY24333@carfax.org.uk> <564E085C.3060208@gmail.com> <20151119182850.GE24333@carfax.org.uk> <564E18B9.2020509@gmail.com> <20151119185645.GF24333@carfax.org.uk> To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <564EEA19.1000109@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:38:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 20.11.2015 um 04:14 schrieb Duncan: > Meta-comment: > > Apparently that attribution should actually be to Hugo Mills. I've no > idea what went wrong, but at least here as received from gmane.org, the > from header really does say linux-btrfs.tebulin, so something obviously > bugged out somewhere! Meta-Answer: My fault I accidentally exposed my spamgourmet proxy address to Hugo by taking him CC. He replied to all assuming it would go directly to the list, but the proxy address masked his original address an put id in it. Sorry for messing up!