From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next V1 0/9] Add RoCE v2 support Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:53:37 -0500 Message-ID: <56536EC1.6020800@redhat.com> References: <1444925232-13598-1-git-send-email-matanb@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bT71EHH3P6pw7C2OvFOi8fugbQOaxlrk7" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Or Gerlitz Cc: Matan Barak , linux-rdma , Or Gerlitz , Jason Gunthorpe , Eran Ben Elisha , Somnath Kotur , Matan Barak , Christoph Lameter , "talal-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --bT71EHH3P6pw7C2OvFOi8fugbQOaxlrk7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/22/2015 04:28 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015, Matan Barak wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 , Matan Barak wrote: >=20 >>> Hi Doug, >>> This series adds the support for RoCE v2. In order to support RoCE v2= , >>> we add gid_type attribute to every GID. When the RoCE GID management >>> populates the GID table, it duplicates each GID with all supported ty= pes. >>> This gives the user the ability to communicate over each supported ty= pe. >=20 >> Hi Doug, >> This series was posted a month ago. >> If you have any comments, I would appreciate if you could please post = them. >=20 > Doug, >=20 > Correction. The series was posted on Aug 13 -- three months ago, see [1= ]. >=20 > I think it's terribly fair enough to know where it stands w.r.t > deployment into 4.5 It's normally fair as you say. However, as you know, I've been out for a while. This set only missed 4.4 because I didn't have time to review it prior to the merge window. Not the fault of anyone who submitted it, but a reality of my life circumstances none the less. Reviewing this and getting the blocked code moving forward is at the top of my 4.5 candidate list. > Lack of RoCE v2 support in the IB core is slowing down the RocE > support for mlx5 and adoption of Soft-RoCE, it's fair enough to ask > for you as maintainer to react/respond after three months the patches > are waiting. >=20 > Or. >=20 > [1] http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-rdma&m=3D143948192926723&w=3D2 >=20 >> Otherwise, could we please push this series to v4.5? >> If you need, I can rebase it over your for-4.5 branch once you'll open= >> such a branch. --=20 Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD --bT71EHH3P6pw7C2OvFOi8fugbQOaxlrk7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWU27IAAoJELgmozMOVy/dCicP/05YSe7x9IhtqVBsvBmJUQaC IRQvIC2QaYv3jf3qmB0Cp4+ZmlQTGf4Jlb+Uthqr3uTA0a5vsTVlVWbGIVmq8IYm Vn1Km7oHMTfWFt4a4EXtrFtCc4K4ROx9ozwSZnHBpfGyoKHIaDGqRtrtoCpVKaGi SdCaIJP3kNga1iUljzf1ThRZcmcZ2c1o0/h0HMK2vEqwc5+FyBQH44phu4/QdQK6 4l4DAKaAV5KmQe1B5Flbjm11cKirZYddtzv0FhV9BPhimvpxFo6J164Uy6qYn10v SSiCs8gwBmSURjiEcfkgmbapkbefiH8wr6xoPP+XZ7AJbgQDou/T2w8qRoTrr0Sh 6UR8IJqUni3q5uhVdWf5Su3sxkwH8VMrv+ZxVheeIVJTkON4huAjej/N+MA/QFr3 gCNtpBz8yHPFXvV6biFffef9BWOfdykGUetV+WURKENrzw6wMtA4C02lI5AO4O7C cRgNpfNymC85EyUiY0yLYcuJVa24rUphkKieuwpDB1+/LRZBem4LUfES+OLz982c fa5PMqihZjWU/O9d2vDhm1cr7oBwPLIRXylsk1IuXxcW4OGMzXLPFmsi5IJLQS1j 0zG6jXCEhpEDXcJZFRzsPikqf9Ls4LU5MyjrJQ7mX6MjhsLwAqN1KB3jXrHxbvaZ mgaY8G/SzhSadkvFrwkv =Bfqx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bT71EHH3P6pw7C2OvFOi8fugbQOaxlrk7-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html