From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756374AbbLAR5P (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2015 12:57:15 -0500 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:9230 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752550AbbLAR5O (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2015 12:57:14 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,369,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="321775677" Message-ID: <565DDF24.4000104@citrix.com> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:55:48 +0000 From: Julien Grall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: , David Vrabel , , Boris Ostrovsky , =?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] block/xen-blkfront: Support non-indirect grant with 64KB page granularity References: <1447873045-14663-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> <20151201153751.GE19885@char.us.oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20151201153751.GE19885@char.us.oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Konrad, On 01/12/15 15:37, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 06:57:23PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is a follow-up on the previous discussion [1] related to guest using 64KB >> page granularity which doesn't boot when the backend isn't using indirect >> descriptor. >> >> This has been successfully tested on ARM64 with both 64KB and 4KB page >> granularity guests and QEMU as the backend. Indeed QEMU doesn't support >> indirect descriptor. >> >> This series is based on xentip/for-linus-4.4 which include the support for >> 64KB Linux guest. > > In the meantime the multi-queue patches have been put in the queue > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git #devel/for-jens-4.5 > > I will try rebasing the patches on top of that. It will likely clash with the multiqueue changes. I will rebase this patch series and resend it. Regards, -- Julien Grall