From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([2001:470:1f0b:db:abcd:42:0:1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1a4EE3-00037S-Aw for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 20:42:08 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: do FIFO processing in nand_get_device() To: Brian Norris References: <1448302147-19272-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1448302147-19272-2-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20151123181811.GO17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20151125173543.GA17151@linutronix.de> <20151202185246.GI64635@google.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse , Artem Bityutskiy , Richard Weinberger , tglx@linutronix.de From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Message-ID: <565F5787.4010300@linutronix.de> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 21:41:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151202185246.GI64635@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 12/02/2015 07:52 PM, Brian Norris wrote: > Your threading is a bit confusing. Is this patch still needed, or did > you fix everything by fixing UBI with these? The three UBI patches are just an optimization and I trigger the life lock with them. This patch is still required. I hope that I can respond to Peter's comments by the end of the week. If you any suggestions please let me know. > Brian Sebastian