All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
To: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@gmail.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Pekon Gupta <pekon@pek-sem.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>,
	Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>,
	"Stahl Martin (Helbling Technik)" <Martin.Stahl@helbling.ch>
Subject: mtd, nand, omap2: parse cmdline partition fail
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 07:48:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56613747.8040907@denx.de> (raw)

Hello Frans,

I just tried current mainline kernel:
commit 2255702db4014d1c69d6037ed7bdad2d2e271985
Merge: 9e5d25e c86576e
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon Nov 30 16:06:44 2015 -0800

     Merge tag 'mn10300-for-linus-v4.4-rc4' of 
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging

on an am3517 based board (mainlining soon). And with your commit:
commit 853f1c58c4b2: mtd: nand: omap2: show parent device structure in sysfs

MTD partitions from cmdline are not longer detected:

[    2.087305] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xcc
[    2.094097] nand: Micron MT29F4G16ABADAWP
[    2.098303] nand: 512 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
[    2.106296] nand: WARNING: MT29F4G16ABADAWP: the ECC used on your system is too weak compared to 
the one required by the NAND chip
[    2.118674] MT29F4G16ABADAWP: 'partitions' subnode not found on /ocp/gpmc@6e000000/nand@0,0. 
Trying to parse direct subnodes as partitions.
[...]

before this patch it worked:
[    2.307444] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xcc
[    2.314092] nand: Micron MT29F4G16ABADAWP
[    2.318348] nand: 512 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
[    2.326331] nand: WARNING: omap2-nand.0: the ECC used on your system is too weak compared to the 
one required by the NAND chip
[    2.338336] 5 cmdlinepart partitions found on MTD device omap2-nand.0
[    2.345129] Creating 5 MTD partitions on "omap2-nand.0":
[    2.350704] 0x000000000000-0x000000080000 : "MLO"
[    2.366877] 0x000000080000-0x000000180000 : "u-boot"
[    2.379179] 0x000000180000-0x0000001c0000 : "env1"
[    2.390627] 0x0000001c0000-0x000000200000 : "env2"
[    2.402255] 0x000000200000-0x000020000000 : "common_data"

Reason is taht the mtd->name has changed from "omap2-nand.0" to the
nand chip name ...

If I revert this part from the patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
index 93f664c..28dcf66 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
@@ -1685,6 +1685,7 @@ static int omap_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
         info->ecc_opt           = pdata->ecc_opt;
         mtd                     = &info->mtd;
         mtd->priv               = &info->nand;
+       mtd->name               = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
         mtd->dev.parent         = &pdev->dev;
         nand_chip               = &info->nand;
         nand_chip->ecc.priv     = NULL;

It works again ...

So the question is, is it intended to change the "mtd->name"?
But wondering, if there are two or more identical nand chips in the
system, they will have the same mtd->name ... which seems buggy to me...

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

             reply	other threads:[~2015-12-04  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-04  6:48 Heiko Schocher [this message]
2015-12-04  7:17 ` mtd, nand, omap2: parse cmdline partition fail Frans Klaver
2015-12-04  8:42   ` Heiko Schocher
2015-12-09 23:19     ` Brian Norris
2015-12-10  7:13       ` Frans Klaver
2015-12-11 23:25         ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56613747.8040907@denx.de \
    --to=hs@denx.de \
    --cc=Martin.Stahl@helbling.ch \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fransklaver@gmail.com \
    --cc=hofrat@osadl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=pekon@pek-sem.com \
    --cc=rogerq@ti.com \
    --cc=sbabic@denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.