From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Panu Matilainen Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] eal/linux: Add support for handling built-in kernel modules Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:25:23 +0200 Message-ID: <566685E3.50902@redhat.com> References: <1449507460-32038-1-git-send-email-Kamil.Rytarowski@caviumnetworks.com> <1449513365-22282-1-git-send-email-Kamil.Rytarowski@caviumnetworks.com> <1449513365-22282-2-git-send-email-Kamil.Rytarowski@caviumnetworks.com> <20151207125524.1095237c@xeon-e3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Stephen Hemminger , Kamil Rytarowski Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76D9FFA for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:25:25 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20151207125524.1095237c@xeon-e3> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 12/07/2015 10:55 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 19:36:05 +0100 > Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > >> + /* Check if there is sysfs mounted */ >> + if (stat("/sys/module", &st) != 0) { >> + RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL, "Open /sys/module failed: %s\n", >> + strerror(errno)); >> return -1; >> } > > This check is useless. > If /sys/module does not exist then /sys/module/XXX won't exist either. Yes, but non-mounted sysfs is an error whereas /sys/module/XXX is merely an existence test, and the current sole caller in pci_vfio_enable() even bothers checking for the difference. So its perhaps a bit academic but its not incorrect. At any rate, the debug messages are incorrect/misleading. It's certainly not trying to *open* these directories so it should not claim to do so. - Panu -