From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933434AbbLHMqo (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:46:44 -0500 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:21566 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933413AbbLHMqm (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:46:42 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,399,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="323388843" Message-ID: <5666D0DD.90108@citrix.com> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 12:45:17 +0000 From: Julien Grall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1vbm7DqQ==?= , , CC: Boris Ostrovsky , David Vrabel Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] block/xen-blkfront: Handle non-indirect grant with 64KB pages References: <1447873045-14663-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> <1447873045-14663-3-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> <565DBD08.5030503@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <565DBD08.5030503@citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-DLP: MIA2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Royger, On 01/12/15 15:30, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > Just a couple of cosmetic comments below. Unless anyone else has real > comments I don't think you need to resend. Well, I'm considering those kind of comestic comments as minor. They are not necessary and doesn't improve the readability of the code. It even make it worth in the two cases. -- Julien Grall