From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vicente Olivert Riera Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 17:30:24 +0000 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] libass: allow compilation without a system font provider In-Reply-To: <20151209172813.GA3743@free.fr> References: <1449505148-9046-1-git-send-email-Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> <20151208171627.GO4188@free.fr> <5668002F.90802@imgtec.com> <20151209172813.GA3743@free.fr> Message-ID: <56686530.3060209@imgtec.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Yann, On 09/12/15 17:28, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > Vicente, All, > > On 2015-12-09 10:19 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera spake thusly: >> On 08/12/15 17:16, Yann E. MORIN wrote: >>> On 2015-12-07 16:19 +0000, Vicente Olivert Riera spake thusly: >>>> If no system font provider is provided, then libass will fail to build >>>> because it requires one by default. The error looks like this: >>>> >>>> configure: error: Either DirectWrite (on Windows), CoreText (on OSX), or >>>> Fontconfig(Linux, other) is required. If you really want to compile >>>> withouta system font provider, add >>>> --disable-require-system-font-provider >>>> >>>> But, as the error messages says, we can allow the compilation without a >>>> system font provider if we use the above configure option, so let's do >>>> it. >>>> >>>> Fixes: >>>> >>>> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/3a4/3a4c07a0a54d5497fa8a4be2191856e286729637/ >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vicente Olivert Riera >>>> --- >>>> package/libass/libass.mk | 3 +++ >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/package/libass/libass.mk b/package/libass/libass.mk >>>> index 83939e2..f1ec503 100644 >>>> --- a/package/libass/libass.mk >>>> +++ b/package/libass/libass.mk >>>> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ ifeq ($(BR2_i386)$(BR2_x86_64),y) >>>> LIBASS_DEPENDENCIES += host-yasm >>>> endif >>>> >>>> +# Allow compilation without a system font provider >>>> +LIBASS_CONF_OPTS = --disable-require-system-font-provider >>> >>> It is my understanding that fontconfig *is* a "system font provider", so >>> maybe that should go n the else-case for fontconfig, below? >>> >>>> ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_FONTCONFIG),y) >>>> LIBASS_DEPENDENCIES += fontconfig >>>> LIBASS_CONF_OPTS += --enable-fontconfig >>> Here: >>> >>> else >>> LIBASS_CONF_OPTS += \ >>> --disable-fontconfig \ >>> --disable-require-system-font-provider >>> endif >> >> That was my first approach, but then I thought a bit more about it, and >> I realized that there could be more system font providers in the future >> (not only fontconfig). So, by using that option we enable the >> possibility to build libass without a system font provider. That doesn't >> mean necessarily that libass will be built without one. If the >> fontconfig package is selected, it will be built with support for it. > > But since that is currently not the case (i.e. we have a single font > provider), I think we should do as I suggest. When/if we have another > font provider, then we can revisit that at that time. With my approach we won't need to revisit it :P > And I don't know what other font provider we'd have on Linux, beside > fontconfig. Arguably, I'm not a font expert either! ;-) Me neither. Anyway, let's the maintainer decide. Regards, Vincent. > Regards, > Yann E. MORIN. >