From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
Subject: Re: best base / worst case RAID 5,6 write speeds
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:19:32 +0000
Message-ID: <5669FA74.6020307@youngman.org.uk>
References: <CAE9DZUR=uSzYfdqFkVFdyXx+iKb1SeXxo5eX7M_nTw-fnWBwNA@mail.gmail.com>
 <22121.38606.101474.41382@quad.stoffel.home>
 <CAE9DZUTO-Muvgp+ofAkoKD1KcunnZ821UeSJch4216iWYL61cQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK2H+ed+fe5Wr0B=h5AzK5_=ougQtW_6cJcUG_S_cg+WfzDb=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE9DZUQsNmsuk=7PjFwvADNj6KdifWt_5qArbhme3f5EmViqyA@mail.gmail.com>
 <22121.54145.780249.40226@quad.stoffel.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <22121.54145.780249.40226@quad.stoffel.home>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org>, Dallas Clement <dallas.a.clement@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>, Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On 10/12/15 19:33, John Stoffel wrote:
> Now it's simpler to just A) buy lots and lots of memory, B) bunches of
> SSDs, C) both, D) beat the developers until they learn to write better
> SQL.
> 
> Sorry, D) never happens.  :-)

Don't get me started ... :-)

Relational first normal form CANNOT be efficient, and it starts with the
first law - "data comes in rows and columns". In the real world, that's
not true, and the rot just gets worse from there ...

Cheers,
Wol