From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/xen: Avoid fast syscall path for
	Xen PV guests
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:54:35 -0500
Message-ID: <567037BB.6080901__43871.8085214079$1450200443$gmane$org@oracle.com>
References: <1447970147-1733-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
	<1447970147-1733-2-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
	<56703001.9010205@oracle.com> <20151215154830.GF26000@pd.tnic>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>) id 1a8tML-0000qm-OE
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:25:57 +0000
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69])
	by aserp1050.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with
	ESMTP id tBFFxmaM006868
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:59:49 GMT
In-Reply-To: <20151215154830.GF26000@pd.tnic>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, luto@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tglx@linutronix.de
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 12/15/2015 10:48 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:21:37AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> I know this has been in the tip tree --- when do you think this will go
>> Linus tree? In the 4.4 timeframe?
> It is queued for 4.5 currently.
>
>> Xen 32-bit PV guests are broken without this.
> So this needs to go into 4.4 or even earlier? Since 5f310f739b4c went
> into 4.4, I'd think 4.4 only for this fix too? Yes?

Oh, I didn't realize this is scheduled for 4.5. It indeed needs to go 
into 4.4 because of 5f310f739b4c.

Thanks.
-boris