Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL

From: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, osstest-admin@xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:08:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56741377.9060807@cardoe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5673F5EF02000078000C11C9@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1915 bytes --]

On 12/18/15 5:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 18.12.15 at 09:03, <osstest-admin@xenproject.org> wrote:
>> flight 66454 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/66454/ 
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>>  build-i386                    5 xen-build                 fail REGR. vs. 66415
>>  build-i386-xsm                5 xen-build                 fail REGR. vs. 66415
> 
> Doug,
> 
> this needs fixing:
> 
> ***
> *** Can't find default configuration "arch/x86/configs/x86_32_defconfig"!
> ***
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/xen'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/xen'
> gcc  -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -m32 -march=i686 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wno-unused-local-typedefs   -O0 -g3 -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD -MF .xc_core.o.d -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs -D_GNU_SOURCE  -I../../xen/common/libelf -Werror -Wmissing-prototypes -I. -I./include -I/home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/tools/libxc/../../tools/include -pthread -include /home/osstest/build.66454.build-i386-xsm/xen/tools/libxc/../../tools/config.h  -c -o xc_core.o xc_core.c 
> make[2]: *** [defconfig] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [.config] Error 2
> make: *** [install-xen] Error 2
> 
> Previously build attempts on ix86 resulted in no error, with just
> 
> *** Xen x86/32 target no longer supported!
> 
> printed.
> 
> Jan
> 

Sure not a problem. I actually had this support in there but one of the
early review comments was to drop x86_32 support (you'll notice I
mention it in the changelog for v2).

-- 
Doug Goldstein

[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 959 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel