From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932850AbbLRQ1z (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:27:55 -0500 Received: from smtpoutz298.laposte.net ([178.22.154.198]:46253 "EHLO smtp.laposte.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932156AbbLRQ1y (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:27:54 -0500 Message-ID: <56743405.8020408@laposte.net> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:27:49 +0100 From: Sebastian Frias User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Hurley CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman , =?UTF-8?B?TcOlbnMgUnU=?= =?UTF-8?B?bGxnw6VyZA==?= , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Mason , Jon Anders Haugum Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] use callbacks to access UART_DLL/UART_DLM References: <5672D89A.4090307@laposte.net> <5672F9C9.1010601@laposte.net> <5673E3FD.8080001@laposte.net> <56742F23.5010501@hurleysoftware.com> In-Reply-To: <56742F23.5010501@hurleysoftware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-VR-SrcIP: 83.142.147.193 X-VR-FullState: 0 X-VR-Score: -100 X-VR-Cause-1: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeekiedrfeehgdeklecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhf X-VR-Cause-2: ihhlvgemucfntefrqffuvffgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhs X-VR-Cause-3: ucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefkfffhfgggvffufhgjtgfgsehtjegrtddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefu X-VR-Cause-4: vggsrghsthhirghnucfhrhhirghsuceoshhfkeegsehlrghpohhsthgvrdhnvghtqeenucfrrghrrghm X-VR-Cause-5: pehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdphhgvlhhopegludejvddrvdejrddtrddvudegngdpihhnvghtpeek X-VR-Cause-6: fedrudegvddrudegjedrudelfedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsfhekgeeslhgrphhoshhtvgdrnhgvthdp X-VR-Cause-7: rhgtphhtthhopehpvghtvghrsehhuhhrlhgvhihsohhfthifrghrvgdrtghomh X-VR-AvState: No X-VR-State: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/18/2015 05:06 PM, Peter Hurley wrote: >> - unsigned char old_dll, old_dlm, old_lcr; >> + unsigned char old_lcr; >> unsigned int id; >> + unsigned int old_dl; > > unsigned int id, old_dl; Ok, thanks for your comments. By the way, should I just do: - unsigned char old_dll, old_dlm, old_lcr; + unsigned char old_lcr, old_dl; ?