From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 00/16] add Intel(R) X722 iWARP driver Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:24:18 -0500 Message-ID: <567AD8C2.3040007@redhat.com> References: <1450739596-23276-1-git-send-email-faisal.latif@intel.com> <567AC754.5020508@redhat.com> <20151223163549.GA22244@flatif-MOBL1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XKR37grWts4MBFSI4q7nUxmqacEd8k3QB" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151223163549.GA22244@flatif-MOBL1> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Faisal Latif Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, e1000-rdma@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --XKR37grWts4MBFSI4q7nUxmqacEd8k3QB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/23/2015 11:35 AM, Faisal Latif wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:09:56AM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: >> On 12/21/2015 06:13 PM, Faisal Latif wrote: >>> This (V1) series contains the addition of the i40iw.ko driver after >>> incorporating the feedback from Christoph Hellwig and Joe Perches for= >>> initial series. >>> >>> This driver provides iWARP RDMA functionality for the Intel(R) X722 E= thernet >>> controller for PCI Physical Functions. It also has support for Virtua= l >>> Function driver (i40iwvf.ko), which that will be part of separate pat= ch >>> series. >>> >>> It cooperates with the Intel(R) X722 base driver (i40e.ko) to allocat= e >>> resources and program the controller. >>> >>> This series include 1 patch to i40e.ko to provide interface support t= o >>> i40iw.ko. The interface provides a driver registration mechanism, res= ource >>> allocations, and device reset coordination mechanisms. >>> >>> This patch series is based on Doug Ledford's k.o/for-4.5. >> >> My apologies Faisal. I had pushed that branch to github to get 0-day >> testing, but hadn't committed it to my k.o tree as it wasn't fully >> finalized (I was waiting for Or to get his chance to respond to it). >> Once Or responded, I ended up taking his patchset instead, which means= >> you need to adjust your patches accordingly. >> >=20 > Thanks Doug for the update, I will provide new patch series for latest > k.o. Also will make sure of shallow threading for the series. I should > have used V2 for this series instead of V1 and next series with k.o wil= l > make it proper with V3. I'm going to repush my tree in 10 or 15 minutes if you haven't done the rebase yet. If so, the tree I pushed earlier this morning should be good enough. --=20 Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD --XKR37grWts4MBFSI4q7nUxmqacEd8k3QB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWetjDAAoJELgmozMOVy/dCH0QAICIZc8eRniu2i4Cb8dUNDih zj5F+GM0De/RqlbFsVeNqx7y+fCDZ69ZnE3ASlw9qlq4H9cCgiPPm6jjJReUmuj6 8PD0revrBC//sgbyWHszLhSQuUjo/K+xw6Evz80zOHu0wf2hNrRo2B3TZthcNerq HMjSM9k2vEvFNUuYYZtH3ItTplAOjB0my6p95FfsAB+C1axRIRoFJMSXtQFplvV1 8in+6gQSTRbNlfXxfWw+/MYP0y6m4XtDFQhq8b+WMAZT+zCN56l4aPAjWjknsfW8 F07aJGoiJG3i49ConoBSDpBzIcFCSOFmP5h8F6QSBCpHB7Ovh8RpDyVqrqWfSL3l 0U4HzuL3C54jxeYSo6gNp0yl0Cyc2Q+uBPt/dZaFQGgU1n+WlSr2JTAbLDlseH+I 3z2rTsledEQVo2v2hzAWJSRZo8QhzByiKgYkSNLNSAP6XL2xAjk2uFX5NOk3DCN0 P8CiowgwTnzN+K15kzIw6U/bfN9+4UYzSJUG3K1CPGgKrPGXs/iTfInZuM6He7Z3 m2iSF4ait2wqIsNr79d98kTGTP7Cn1qp3Upk5lijwWB1W8cMgikRb2YuQM8CqZcr Jp6FgOLIGf90pyMY3E2/2cFyH8jhTqYZmwd7N8kCIB5suGqB00prgwSul7Pqd3gi SMFGTTZa6rHtB+IVS+t7 =z/7o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XKR37grWts4MBFSI4q7nUxmqacEd8k3QB--