From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:37036 "EHLO mail-wm0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752658AbcADKF7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2016 05:05:59 -0500 Subject: Re: net-libertas: Better exception handling in if_spi_host_to_card_worker() To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5686F0B2.5000000@users.sourceforge.net> <56870866.7020000@cogentembedded.com> <568785B3.5000905@users.sourceforge.net> <5687939E.7010701@users.sourceforge.net> <5687A2C7.3000704@gmail.com> <5687B2BC.8090901@users.sourceforge.net> <5688EBAC.5000701@gmail.com> Cc: SF Markus Elfring , Julia Lawall , Sergei Shtylyov , libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Network Development , Kalle Valo , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org From: Arend van Spriel Message-ID: <568A4403.8020701@gmail.com> (sfid-20160104_110637_772656_D197B454) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:05:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03-01-16 16:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 3 January 2016 at 10:36, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> On 02-01-16 12:21, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >>>> Did you look at the resulting assembly code for different target architectures? >>> >>> Not yet. - Which execution system variants would you recommend for >>> further comparisons? >> >> Guess x86{,_64} and arm would be good candidates, ie. CISC vs. RISC. > > Oh, don't forget about MIPS with its fancy branches handling. You know > about it, don't you? You are asking me, right ;-) ? I have come across my share of MIPS platforms here at Broadcom, but I still try to avoid them as much as possible. > I'm against this patch as well. and counting... :-p Regards, Arend From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arend van Spriel Subject: Re: net-libertas: Better exception handling in if_spi_host_to_card_worker() Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:05:55 +0100 Message-ID: <568A4403.8020701@gmail.com> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5686F0B2.5000000@users.sourceforge.net> <56870866.7020000@cogentembedded.com> <568785B3.5000905@users.sourceforge.net> <5687939E.7010701@users.sourceforge.net> <5687A2C7.3000704@gmail.com> <5687B2BC.8090901@users.sourceforge.net> <5688EBAC.5000701@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: SF Markus Elfring , Julia Lawall , Sergei Shtylyov , libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Network Development , Kalle Valo , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 03-01-16 16:18, Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki wrote: > On 3 January 2016 at 10:36, Arend van Spriel wrot= e: >> On 02-01-16 12:21, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >>>> Did you look at the resulting assembly code for different target a= rchitectures? >>> >>> Not yet. - Which execution system variants would you recommend for >>> further comparisons? >> >> Guess x86{,_64} and arm would be good candidates, ie. CISC vs. RISC. >=20 > Oh, don't forget about MIPS with its fancy branches handling. You kno= w > about it, don't you? You are asking me, right ;-) ? I have come across my share of MIPS platforms here at Broadcom, but I still try to avoid them as much as possible. > I'm against this patch as well. and counting... :-p Regards, Arend -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janito= rs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arend van Spriel Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 10:05:55 +0000 Subject: Re: net-libertas: Better exception handling in if_spi_host_to_card_worker() Message-Id: <568A4403.8020701@gmail.com> List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5686F0B2.5000000@users.sourceforge.net> <56870866.7020000@cogentembedded.com> <568785B3.5000905@users.sourceforge.net> <5687939E.7010701@users.sourceforge.net> <5687A2C7.3000704@gmail.com> <5687B2BC.8090901@users.sourceforge.net> <5688EBAC.5000701@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: SF Markus Elfring , Julia Lawall , Sergei Shtylyov , libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Network Development , Kalle Valo , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On 03-01-16 16:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 3 January 2016 at 10:36, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> On 02-01-16 12:21, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >>>> Did you look at the resulting assembly code for different target architectures? >>> >>> Not yet. - Which execution system variants would you recommend for >>> further comparisons? >> >> Guess x86{,_64} and arm would be good candidates, ie. CISC vs. RISC. > > Oh, don't forget about MIPS with its fancy branches handling. You know > about it, don't you? You are asking me, right ;-) ? I have come across my share of MIPS platforms here at Broadcom, but I still try to avoid them as much as possible. > I'm against this patch as well. and counting... :-p Regards, Arend