From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: Xen 4.7 Development Update Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 06:52:37 -0700 Message-ID: <568D2A3502000078000C3F62@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> References: <568BD9D802000066000968FA@relay2.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aGoW6-0004em-HC for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 13:52:46 +0000 In-Reply-To: <568BD9D802000066000968FA@relay2.provo.novell.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Chun Yan Liu Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, wei.liu2@citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 05.01.16 at 07:57, wrote: >>>> On 1/4/2016 at 06:15 PM, in message , Wei Liu wrote: Chun Yan (and others), please remember to limit quoting especially (but not limited to) when replying to Development Update mails: Commonly (like in your case) people really just reply to a single or very few items: >> * PV USB passthrough >> - Chunyan Liu > > Reviewed by George Dunlap. > V12: > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-12/msg02697.html > >[...] >> * Domain snapshot API >> - Chunyan Liu > > Doc: > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-08/msg00884.html > > RFC implementation, has many limitations, call for comments: > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-08/msg02384.html Hence the writer of the response can save everyone's time by making sure readers don't have to hunt/scroll for that one item through the entire quoted original mail. Jan