From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753191AbcAGUHt (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:07:49 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:53111 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752352AbcAGUHr (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:07:47 -0500 Subject: Re: net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection To: Joe Perches References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5685A273.6070607@users.sourceforge.net> <20160107110701.GE25086@rric.localdomain> <568EBCE7.4060502@users.sourceforge.net> <1452195846.4028.24.camel@perches.com> <568EC2FD.9000702@users.sourceforge.net> <1452196790.4028.33.camel@perches.com> Cc: Robert Richter , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sunil Goutham , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <568EC56A.402@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:07:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1452196790.4028.33.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:geayDiI0aMBDISdvrQvwBkOTQ7SUtFNjDKo6AAuJjUiobzX1om2 L1eEh42aWI5OtHadWzx7K3nJRnJv4Hyk42aZ4PbDWIfs4TGVz1i4mzLWT5sjuLiQnQn+mRr qTnlvChrOS5AyCgzCgH4oS5KaekIaUaE68gv8rURnJwPKo7LSf+1xWdr99iY6P7WN4JeQ80 GFihfr2mrKUMaQIEPO0AA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:73a2ZsPYbRE=:FxWdjp6r3QsL/t6BAbfuBb TSM2hV7fOxgmeVioMJhbNnuJNMVpkY1J7QuTGgMKlGoRAwJ99LH+iZ3rCLMGr4MSeLTeALK9s r9q0gJhtswmfbZr9nOqtQcp6FbIsGTHE2pM66uG0GlvP3VZoaMFcewSEBXWPiwiyZhtdlq/gC 2hSn9wYxVtOXW0Bx6sYbK6hxTt2i8G4Ys7p2Klk42D1ZkI1xgpiuOCQ0krlhuoeAqjS4hEQgl tY0jsDBrhoD0CrCBOeLNIKLvDnD7hZYU/RFqZdp+OaitDWHhm+IaDw04ebPIowwdLljpgJFXO 9ivTPwfMNouoYLxR5Cgaf+aUAfJBTmP7tI0NMTi0Ih/DPEYfibJ2y9OlPqGluTK9I0z93JY2x NE+r0TGfM5mCI45zWIno+RARHyi0dqsY6QwbmbDCIe4TJ6c6INqgpFEumHj+YbXCddQCh3aXb dzvBy+EIDnr+C9MUNStvtIDq+yyeF/aLZPyRAmHCmRV53OH9yIl1mtUmfCRcg4IWHidoDmLyT ZY1RXcMmNuTPkLPQ2EfA0lGJ0rIGxTkY2ph8YG6GdlgVCfTGmKFNnPmXgg3M5e9VJNjg53Zfu 5KExQGj6yGev1ELlaCOAg0ZdX8T/j7v0Vwf5Cfblt7na07vwWCmSAFhKCFtdm83dmctVfCrya WucNWUQlg78cHXAaf1+GQHNlgaI+pc4km72G2uMVlonaaIqTu6k5Mca5GPfhbGmjpz1swxUOf zg5AksbusZ9pisAJl3H3r3dDJ9jY0+5+7kC63gJCrKRVLmwD98Ufj0hsrbMcex46gGcJrR1eL ymp2YmJ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> * Which object code representations would you find representative >> for a further constructive discussion around this >> software component? > > Evidence of actual object code improvement How do you think about to provide a function implementation which looks a bit more efficient by default? > when with compiled with optimizations. Which combinations of hardware and software would you recommend for corresponding system checks? Regards, Markus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 20:07:06 +0000 Subject: Re: net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection Message-Id: <568EC56A.402@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5685A273.6070607@users.sourceforge.net> <20160107110701.GE25086@rric.localdomain> <568EBCE7.4060502@users.sourceforge.net> <1452195846.4028.24.camel@perches.com> <568EC2FD.9000702@users.sourceforge.net> <1452196790.4028.33.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: <1452196790.4028.33.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> * Which object code representations would you find representative >> for a further constructive discussion around this >> software component? > > Evidence of actual object code improvement How do you think about to provide a function implementation which looks a bit more efficient by default? > when with compiled with optimizations. Which combinations of hardware and software would you recommend for corresponding system checks? Regards, Markus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring) Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:07:06 +0100 Subject: net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after error detection In-Reply-To: <1452196790.4028.33.camel@perches.com> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <5685A273.6070607@users.sourceforge.net> <20160107110701.GE25086@rric.localdomain> <568EBCE7.4060502@users.sourceforge.net> <1452195846.4028.24.camel@perches.com> <568EC2FD.9000702@users.sourceforge.net> <1452196790.4028.33.camel@perches.com> Message-ID: <568EC56A.402@users.sourceforge.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org >> * Which object code representations would you find representative >> for a further constructive discussion around this >> software component? > > Evidence of actual object code improvement How do you think about to provide a function implementation which looks a bit more efficient by default? > when with compiled with optimizations. Which combinations of hardware and software would you recommend for corresponding system checks? Regards, Markus