From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Subject: What is branch xen/pvhvm-stefano ?
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <569438.233.qm@web56103.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003151550510.25829@kaball-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0082592921=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003151550510.25829@kaball-desktop>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============0082592921==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-142731925-1268670824=:233"

--0-142731925-1268670824=:233
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Do you mean check out xen/pvhvm-stefano. Build Dom0 kernel based on this br=
anch.
Load under patched Hypervisor and try to create HVM DOMU.

Please confirm. Maybe you mean something else ?

Boris

--- On Mon, 3/15/10, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> =
wrote:

From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.=
com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@linux.intel.com>,=
 "Stefano Stabellini" <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Date: Monday, March 15, 2010, 11:53 AM

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 03/12/2010 02:13 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> > Yes. That's what i see on my box.
> >
>=20
> OK, over to you Stefano.=A0 Why is Boris seeing an instacrash in dom0 wit=
h=20
> your patches in place?
>=20

I think it might be a problem of the old "enhanced" patch series; surely
this bug cannot affect the new series because the same kernel cannot be
used for dom0 and domU anymore (the new series is applied to a clean
2.6.32 kernel).

Boris, could you please checkout the new branch pvhvm-stefano and see if
it works for you as an HVM DomU?
The xen side patch is still required.

=0A=0A=0A      
--0-142731925-1268670824=:233
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;">Do you mean check out xen/pvhvm-stefano. Buil=
d Dom0 kernel based on this branch.<br>Load under patched Hypervisor and tr=
y to create HVM DOMU.<br><br>Please confirm. Maybe you mean something else =
?<br><br>Boris<br><br>--- On <b>Mon, 3/15/10, Stefano Stabellini <i>&lt;ste=
fano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com&gt;</i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style=3D"bo=
rder-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;=
"><br>From: Stefano Stabellini &lt;stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com&gt;<br>=
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen<br>To: "Jeremy Fitzha=
rdinge" &lt;jeremy@goop.org&gt;<br>Cc: "Boris Derzhavets" &lt;bderzhavets@y=
ahoo.com&gt;, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" &lt;xen-devel@lists.xensource=
.com&gt;, "Sheng Yang" &lt;sheng@linux.intel.com&gt;, "Stefano Stabellini" =
&lt;Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com&gt;<br>Date: Monday, March 15, 2010, 1=
1:53
 AM<br><br><div class=3D"plainMail">On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Jeremy Fitzharding=
e wrote:<br>&gt; On 03/12/2010 02:13 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:<br>&gt; &g=
t; Yes. That's what i see on my box.<br>&gt; &gt;<br>&gt; <br>&gt; OK, over=
 to you Stefano.&nbsp; Why is Boris seeing an instacrash in dom0 with <br>&=
gt; your patches in place?<br>&gt; <br><br>I think it might be a problem of=
 the old "enhanced" patch series; surely<br>this bug cannot affect the new =
series because the same kernel cannot be<br>used for dom0 and domU anymore =
(the new series is applied to a clean<br>2.6.32 kernel).<br><br>Boris, coul=
d you please checkout the new branch pvhvm-stefano and see if<br>it works f=
or you as an HVM DomU?<br>The xen side patch is still required.<br><br></di=
v></blockquote></td></tr></table><br>=0A=0A      
--0-142731925-1268670824=:233--



--===============0082592921==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

--===============0082592921==--