From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: InfiniBand-ocrdma: Delete unnecessary variable initialisations in 11 functions Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:30:22 +0100 Message-ID: <5699FF9E.3030708@users.sourceforge.net> References: <5697D865.5010507@users.sourceforge.net> <5697DE31.9040309@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115132014.GC30615@leon.nu> <56990733.7000506@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115150935.GA32346@leon.nu> <56990FAC.6000506@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115155938.GB32346@leon.nu> <56991D52.8030808@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115170048.GC32346@leon.nu> <56993833.2050809@users.sourceforge.net> <20160116061843.GE32346@leon.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160116061843.GE32346-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Leon Romanovsky Cc: Devesh Sharma , Doug Ledford , Hal Rosenstock , Mitesh Ahuja , Sean Hefty , Selvin Xavier , LKML , kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Julia Lawall , kbuild-all-JC7UmRfGjtg@public.gmane.org, ltp-cunTk1MwBs91InPhgRC9rw@public.gmane.org, users-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > Please provide the numbers BEFORE and AFTER your change which can > support that your so called "fine-tuning" worked. For which combinations of hardware and software versions would you like to see corresponding results from detailed system checks and special benchmarks? > We are waiting to see it together with Tested-By tag to emphasize > that your code was tested on real HW and passed minimal sanity checks. Are any other contributors interested to collaborate for such a task? > NAK on this patch. Thanks for your feedback. Does it mean that you reject (only) the proposed source code adjustments around the variable "status" in the shown function selection at the moment? Would you like to clarify the other update steps from this patch series a bit more? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751277AbcAPIau (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jan 2016 03:30:50 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:65068 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750973AbcAPIas (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jan 2016 03:30:48 -0500 Subject: Re: InfiniBand-ocrdma: Delete unnecessary variable initialisations in 11 functions To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Leon Romanovsky References: <5697D865.5010507@users.sourceforge.net> <5697DE31.9040309@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115132014.GC30615@leon.nu> <56990733.7000506@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115150935.GA32346@leon.nu> <56990FAC.6000506@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115155938.GB32346@leon.nu> <56991D52.8030808@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115170048.GC32346@leon.nu> <56993833.2050809@users.sourceforge.net> <20160116061843.GE32346@leon.nu> Cc: Devesh Sharma , Doug Ledford , Hal Rosenstock , Mitesh Ahuja , Sean Hefty , Selvin Xavier , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , kbuild-all@01.org, ltp@lists.linux.it, users@lists.openfabrics.org From: SF Markus Elfring X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <5699FF9E.3030708@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:30:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160116061843.GE32346@leon.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0N0h6iDmIPJ1SUh1phbBVgxH1LVvwV3McL8d0zeKu7YXnqTa+O/ uj1gj8tuOBk25lReQ5zFeEkVIE3sUXgWgEHK/KdPGMFs1RWfW3QnYC7F63lgoSeqqUPEz2v vCW2EAUz1nBR6wXfw27mfu4U9iJm/SVJZMXZ9XllICvNfdKE5M3UF8WdOpGWg0L0h4NGrjp cLN5urmYcrmBTCpTJERpw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:P0bu4u1pGyE=:mDaKoqTKiI3Uy+Cq5D5pM5 r0v8gbv2Nl9/WRJQdaf/4c39GTI2xVVD72qEO07JHTgwUQwplEhXlqZEDtN5gR+26BAlekpn1 /0HTGq0V/1S1EiRB3sPEE08FSiybuZdcUypyqub/rEikj2j+VHcByizX8pq0Q0NaSqpTLkqao BjYYOIPrgEAMWSGMsxw2njPb4IrB40zCQgT3Ge6GbZ4pn9GOtlf6vEUss1qRT3yK2S04V1ODn 9FHKih3wJQC/xTBRgCuQrxsmub3jYU41R2v6oV4FCP8jEr0GOAZP5cnGZWBgEW7zPtx6KA50I tyPrbiOStx+0hlYO4+DhN7+ucDeXmHW6Qz8C31zOzA049mVYDTthKTegEIzjCqf7iBYLmTazi yEjBL+HZX3Njf5vuqQobMSbQE+9gfMYFrhYGEtn9wyS07kluecQ23Al+rPuoazqlTaggMxTfn ngovYi8ojuP9EI97sGpYyDkowqDq/W34PXW+Dzcf6o+NhVj1kxtlGJsbFlwLtUX/Ed9SpiP8j I8YO7h6UyZ5wnLMb08LbF6+4yH45qQCa4K0/AYUGpK2oYJRACdtOhYEiAbPRPuRsE6YIU+OgT JKFMcVpZudlG1EpidQ6Ch8f8geeYtFf+cZiudsBdsGV2q1aduWvdsvaq240PM3D8trd7fVu+h g+RDvnDk2dJ4pjUpl5jXUSSJNis03JcaSdpGHs6O9CCTvsDFm3RFO2b2dG4BFbUxKnh6wUhSi sgFMafQS+sGEokuoOLjt53v4CoxLR1qT7QftM5clSF1DTair5c0z16u7etul3U/U0DMWSPL9r KnBRQoJ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Please provide the numbers BEFORE and AFTER your change which can > support that your so called "fine-tuning" worked. For which combinations of hardware and software versions would you like to see corresponding results from detailed system checks and special benchmarks? > We are waiting to see it together with Tested-By tag to emphasize > that your code was tested on real HW and passed minimal sanity checks. Are any other contributors interested to collaborate for such a task? > NAK on this patch. Thanks for your feedback. Does it mean that you reject (only) the proposed source code adjustments around the variable "status" in the shown function selection at the moment? Would you like to clarify the other update steps from this patch series a bit more? Regards, Markus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 08:30:22 +0000 Subject: Re: InfiniBand-ocrdma: Delete unnecessary variable initialisations in 11 functions Message-Id: <5699FF9E.3030708@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <5697D865.5010507@users.sourceforge.net> <5697DE31.9040309@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115132014.GC30615@leon.nu> <56990733.7000506@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115150935.GA32346@leon.nu> <56990FAC.6000506@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115155938.GB32346@leon.nu> <56991D52.8030808@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115170048.GC32346@leon.nu> <56993833.2050809@users.sourceforge.net> <20160116061843.GE32346@leon.nu> In-Reply-To: <20160116061843.GE32346-2ukJVAZIZ/Y@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Leon Romanovsky Cc: Devesh Sharma , Doug Ledford , Hal Rosenstock , Mitesh Ahuja , Sean Hefty , Selvin Xavier , LKML , kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Julia Lawall , kbuild-all-JC7UmRfGjtg@public.gmane.org, ltp-cunTk1MwBs91InPhgRC9rw@public.gmane.org, users-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > Please provide the numbers BEFORE and AFTER your change which can > support that your so called "fine-tuning" worked. For which combinations of hardware and software versions would you like to see corresponding results from detailed system checks and special benchmarks? > We are waiting to see it together with Tested-By tag to emphasize > that your code was tested on real HW and passed minimal sanity checks. Are any other contributors interested to collaborate for such a task? > NAK on this patch. Thanks for your feedback. Does it mean that you reject (only) the proposed source code adjustments around the variable "status" in the shown function selection at the moment? Would you like to clarify the other update steps from this patch series a bit more? Regards, Markus From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:30:22 +0100 Subject: [LTP] InfiniBand-ocrdma: Delete unnecessary variable initialisations in 11 functions In-Reply-To: <20160116061843.GE32346@leon.nu> References: <5697D865.5010507@users.sourceforge.net> <5697DE31.9040309@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115132014.GC30615@leon.nu> <56990733.7000506@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115150935.GA32346@leon.nu> <56990FAC.6000506@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115155938.GB32346@leon.nu> <56991D52.8030808@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115170048.GC32346@leon.nu> <56993833.2050809@users.sourceforge.net> <20160116061843.GE32346@leon.nu> Message-ID: <5699FF9E.3030708@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it > Please provide the numbers BEFORE and AFTER your change which can > support that your so called "fine-tuning" worked. For which combinations of hardware and software versions would you like to see corresponding results from detailed system checks and special benchmarks? > We are waiting to see it together with Tested-By tag to emphasize > that your code was tested on real HW and passed minimal sanity checks. Are any other contributors interested to collaborate for such a task? > NAK on this patch. Thanks for your feedback. Does it mean that you reject (only) the proposed source code adjustments around the variable "status" in the shown function selection at the moment? Would you like to clarify the other update steps from this patch series a bit more? Regards, Markus